Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques
Z. S. Khabadze,
M. Yu. Dashtieva,
M. M. Borlakova,
A. K. Urazgulov,
D. P. Smirnov,
Z. V. Kozlova,
T. A. Eliseeva,
M. V. Kostinskaya,
A. V. Shegai https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0009
Abstract
AIM. To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the differences between the clinical performance of restorations made with total-etch and self-etch techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. A literature search was conducted in the Pubmed, Google Scholar and Cyberleninka databases. The research was done according to the PICO strategy. Articles from the last 10 years (2013–2023) were included in the review.
RESULTS. After screening 1005 articles, 52 studies were subjected to data extraction. There were no statistically significant differences in any study regarding recurrence of caries. In 9 of 14 articles, retention was higher with the total-etch technique. Total-etch groups showed better marginal adaptation in 11 of 19 studies. 11 of 17 studies recorded the least marginal staining using the total-etch technique. None of the studies found statistically significant results for the presence of post-operative sensitivity at the end of the follow-up period. However, three studies reported statistically significant evidence of post-operative sensitivity at baseline, and after 12 months (1/2 follow-up) in the total-etch groups only.
CONCLUSIONS. Both methods show effective and clinically acceptable restoration performance.
About the Authors
Z. S. Khabadze
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Zurab S. Khabadze – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
Medical Institute, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
M. Yu. Dashtieva
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Marina Yu. Dashtieva – Assistant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
M. M. Borlakova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Mariana M. Borlakova – Assistant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
A. K. Urazgulov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Almaz K. Urazgulov – Research Associate, Laboratory Assistant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
D. P. Smirnov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Denis P. Smirnov – Research Associate, Laboratory Assistant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Z. V. Kozlova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Zinaida V. Kozlova – Research Associate, Laboratory Assistant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
T. A. Eliseeva
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Tatiana A. Eliseeva – Research Associate, Laboratory Assistant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
M. V. Kostinskaya
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Maria V. Kostinskaya – Research Associate, Laboratory Assistant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
A. V. Shegai
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Alexey V. Shegai – Research Associate, Laboratory Assistant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry
6 Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
1. Ruschel V.C., Shibata S., Stolf S.C., Chung Y., Baratieri L.N., Heymann H.O., Walter R. Eighteen-month clinical study of universal adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2018;43(3):241–249. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-320-C
2. de Paris Matos T., Perdigão J., de Paula E., Coppla F., Hass V., Scheffer R.F., Reis A., Loguercio A.D. Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: A randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater. 2020;36(11):1474–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007
3. Çakır N.N., Demirbuga S. The effect of five different universal adhesives on the clinical success of class I restorations: 24-month clinical follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(6):2767–2776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2708-3
4. de Albuquerque E.G., Warol F., Calazans F.S., Poubel L.A., Marins S.S., Matos T., de Souza J.J., Reis A., de Oliveira Barceleiro M., Loguercio A.D. A new dual-cure universal simplified adhesive: 18-month randomized multicenter clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2020;45(5):E255–E270. https:// doi.org/10.2341/19-144-C
5. Loguercio A.D., de Paula E.A., Hass V., Luque-Martinez I., Reis A., Perdigão J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-Month randomized doubleblind clinical trial. J Dent. 2015;43:1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.005
6. Oz F.D., Ergin E., Canatan S. Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etchand-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019;27:e20180358. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0358
7. Follak A.C., Ilha B.D., Oling J., Savian T., Rocha R.O., Soares F.Z.M. Clinical behavior of universal adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2021;113:103747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103747
8. Vinagre A., Ramos J., Marques F., Chambino A., Messias A., Mata A. Randomized clinical trial of five adhesive systems in occlusal restorations: One-year results. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(3):397–406. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-011
9. Peumans M., Vandormael S., Heeren A., De Munck J., Van Meerbeek B. Six-year clinical performance of a 2-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2021;23(3):201–215. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b1367831
10. Oz F.D., Dursun M.N., Ergin E. Clinical performance of a “no wait” universal adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions: a two-year randomized controlled clinical trial. J Adhes Dent. 2022;24(1):313–323. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b3240675
11. Yazici A.R., Uslu Tekce A., Kutuk Z.B. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2022;117:103921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103921
12. Kemaloğlu H., Atalayin Ozkaya C., Ergucu Z., Onal B. Follow-up of flowable resin composites performed with a universal adhesive system in non-carious cervical lesions: A randomized, controlled 24-month clinical trial. Am J Dent. 2020;33(1):39–42. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32056414/ (accessed: 23.01.2024).
13. Perdigão J., Ceballos L., Giráldez I., Baracco B., Fuentes M.V. Effect of a hydrophobic bonding resin on the 36-month performance of a universal adhesive-a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(2):765–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02940-x
14. Carvalho A.A., Leite M.M., Zago J.K.M., Nunes C.A.B.C.M., Barata T.J.E., Freitas G.C., Torres É.M., Lopes L.G. Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin – a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):252. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0913-3
15. Fuentes M.V., Perdigão J., Baracco B., Giráldez I., Ceballos L. Effect of an additional bonding resin on the 5-year performance of a universal adhesive: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(2):837–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04613-8
16. de Almeida R.A.M., Lima S.N.L., Nassif M.V., Mattos N.H.R., de Matos T.P., de Jesus Tavarez R.R., Cardenas A.F.M., Bandeca M.C., Loguercio A.D. Eighteenmonth clinical evaluation of a new universal adhesive applied in the “no-waiting” technique: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(1):151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04703-7
17. Atalay C., Ozgunaltay G., Yazici A.R. Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03052-2
18. Zanatta R.F., Silva T.M., Esper M.A.L.R., Bresciani E., Gonçalves S.E.P., Caneppele T.M.F. Bonding performance of simplified adhesive systems in noncarious cervical lesions at 2-year follow-up: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2019;44:476–487. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-049-C
19. Haak R., Hähnel M., Schneider H., Rosolowski M., Park K.J., Ziebolz D., Häfer M. Clinical and OCT outcomes of a universal adhesive in a randomized clinical trial after 12 months. J Dent. 2019;90:103200. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103200
20. Peumans M., Wouters L., De Munck J., Van Meerbeek B., Van Landuyt K. Nine-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(3):195–203. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a40630
21. Barceleiro M.O., Lopes L.S., Tardem C., Calazans F.S., Matos T.P., Reis A., Calixto A.L., Loguercio A.D. Thirtysix-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(6):4337–4350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04397-x
22. Lawson N.C., Robles A., Fu C.C., Lin C.P., Sawlani K., Burgess J.O. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in noncarious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015;43:1229–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009
23. Perdigão J., Kose C., Mena-Serrano A.P., De Paula E.A., Tay L.Y., Reis A., et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014;39:113–127. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-045-C
24. Burgess J.O., Sadid-Zadeh R., Cakir D., Ramp L.C. Clinical evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems in noncarious cervical lesions: a two-year report. Oper Dent. 2013;38(5):477–487. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-355-CR
25. Moosavi H., Kimyai S., Forghani M., Khodadadi R. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation. Oper Dent. 2013;38(2):134–41. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-110-CR
26. Van Landuyt K.L., De Munck J., Ermis R.B., Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(4):1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1061-9
27. van Dijken J.W., Pallesen U. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(6):1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1345-8
28. de Oliveira F.G., Machado L.S., Sundfeld-Neto D., Giannini M., Briso A.L., Dos Santos P.H., Sundefeld M.L., Sundfeld R.H. Two-year clinical evaluation of a nanofilled etch-and-rinse and a self-etch adhesive system containing MDPB and fluoride in non-carious cervical lesions. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017;38(3):e1–e4. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28257217/ (accessed: 23.01.2024).
29. van Dijken J.W. A randomized controlled 5-year prospective study of two HEMA-free adhesives, a 1-step self etching and a 3-step etch-and-rinse, in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater. 2013;29(11):e271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.203
30. Mena-Serrano A., Kose C., De Paula E.A., Tay L.Y., Reis A., Loguercio A.D., Perdigão J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(1):55–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12005
31. Baracco B., Perdigão J., Cabrera E., Ceballos L. Two-year clinical performance of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations. Oper Dent. 2013;38(6):591–600. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-364-C
32. Delbons F.B., Perdigão J., Araujo E., Melo Freire C.A., Caldas D.D., Cardoso J.L., Pagani M., Borges G.A., Lima R.B. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in posterior restorations-18-month results. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(2):107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12135
33. Lopes L.S., Calazans F.S., Hidalgo R., Buitrago L.L., Gutierrez F., Reis A., Loguercio A.D., Barceleiro M.O. Six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with a new universal adhesive system: a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2016;41(5):465–480. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-309-C
34. Paula E.A., Tay L.Y., Kose C., Mena-Serrano A., Reis A., Perdigão J., Loguercio A.D. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015;10(1):122–145. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25625130/ (accessed: 23.01.2024).
35. Yarovaya S.P., Popov R.V., Ganich I.G. Clinical evaluation of adhesive systems of total etching and self-etching. Ukrainian Dental Almanac. 2013;(4). (In Ukrain.)
36. Daudt E., Lopes G.C., Vieira L.C. Does operatory field isolation influence the performance of direct adhesive restorations? J Adhes Dent. 2013;15(1):27–32. https:// doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28194
37. Häfer M., Jentsch H., Haak R., Schneider H. A three-year clinical evaluation of a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015;43(3):350–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.009
38. Yaman B.C., Doğruer I., Gümüştaş B., Efes B.G. Threeyear randomized clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(4):1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1079-z
39. Tuncer D., Yazici A.R., Özgünaltay G., Dayangac B. Clinical evaluation of different adhesives used in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: 24-month results. Aust Dent J. 2013;58(1):94–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12028
40. Walter R., Swift E.J. Jr, Boushell L.W., Reymann H., Wilder A.D. Jr, Sturdevan J. et al. Clinical evaluation of dental adhesives of different bonding strategies. In: IADR/ AADR/CADR General Session and Exhibition, March 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266784666_Clinical_evaluation_of_dental_adhesives_of_different_bonding_strategies (accessed: 23.01.2024).
41. de Araújo J.F., de Barros T.A., Braga E.M.F., Loretto S.C., de Almeida Rodrigues Silva e Souza P., Honorato Silva e Souza Jr M. One-year evaluation of a simplified ethanol-wet bonding technique: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(3):267–272. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302128
42. Blunck U., Steidten J., Sandberg N., Zaslansky P., Twoyear clinical performance of one-step self-etch adhesive in cervical restorations. In: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session and Exhibition, March 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266806595_Two-year_Clinical_Performance_of_One-step_Selfetch_Adhesives_in_Cervical_Restorations (accessed: 23.01.2024).
43. de Oliveira F.G. Análise clínica e clínica/digital de restaurações de lesões cervicais não cariosas: efeitos dos sistemas adesivos e tempos de análise. Tese (doutorado) – Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba; 2013. 80 f.
44. Tian F.C., Wang X.Y., Gao X.J. Clinical evaluation of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive and a one-step selfetch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesion. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2014;46(1):58–61. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24535349/ (accessed: 23.01.2024).
45. Albuquerque E., Santana F., Calazans F., Poubel L., Marins S., Paris T. et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial. Rev Bras Odontol. 2017;74(4):251. https://doi.org/10.18363/rbo.v74n4.p.251
46. Islatince Özkubat G., Yaman B.C., Tepe H., Irmak Ö. Clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions restored with a universal adhesive assessed according to the FDI criteria. Cumhur Dent J. 2018;21:357–370. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.467923
47. Ruschel V.C., Stolf S.C., Shibata S., Chung Y., Boushell L.W., Baratieri L.N., Walter R. Three-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent. 2019;32(5):223–228. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31675189/ (accessed: 23.01.2024).
48. Kemaloğlu H., Atalayin Ozkaya C., Ergucu Z., Onal B. Follow-up of flowable resin composites performed with a universal adhesive system in non-carious cervical lesions: A randomized, controlled 24-month clinical trial. Am J Dent. 2020;33(1):39–42. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32056414/ (accessed: 23.01.2024).
49. Haak R., Schmidt P., Park K.J., Häfer M., Krause F., Ziebolz D., Schneider H. OCT for early quality evaluation of tooth-composite bond in clinical trials. J Dent. 2018;76:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.007
50. Cruz J., Silva A.L., Eira R., Coito C., Lopes M., Cavalheiro A. 6-month clinical performance of a universal adhesive on non-carious cervical lesions: self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques. Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac. 2020;61(3):97–105. https://doi.org/10.24873/j.rpemd.2020.11.713
51. Ruschel V.C., Stolf S.C., da Luz Baratieri C., Chung Y., Boushell L.W., Baratieri L.N, Walter R. Five-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2023;48(4):364–372. https://doi.org/10.2341/21-132-C
52. Cruz J., Silva A.L., Eira R., Coito C., Sousa B.R., Lopes M.M., Cavalheiro A. 24-Month clinical performance of a universal adhesive on non-carious cervical lesions: Self-etch and etch-and-rinse techniques. J Adhes Dent. 2021;23(5):379–387. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000173
Review
For citations:
Khabadze Z.S., Dashtieva M.Yu., Borlakova M.M., Urazgulov A.K., Smirnov D.P., Kozlova Z.V., Eliseeva T.A., Kostinskaya M.V., Shegai A.V. Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques. Endodontics Today. 2024;22(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0009
Email this article 