Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets
https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0020
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Over the past decades, there has been significant growth in adhesive technologies for fixed orthodontic appliances. Developments in adhesive systems have focused on simplified methods of use, improved composition and high bonding ability to tooth structure.
AIM. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength of a 5th generation adhesive system and a universal adhesive system in two etching techniques for fixation of metal brackets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study consisted sample of 30 removed human upper premolars. The teeth were randomly distributed into three groups, 10 in each group. In the group 1, the Transbond XT adhesive system (3M Unitek) was used, in the group 2 – the universal adhesive Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) in the etching technique, in the group 3 – Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) in the self-etching technique. The study used metal brackets for upper premolars Gemini Bracket MBT (3M Unitek, USA) with a micro-engraved base with an area of 10.61 mm.
RESULTS. In group 1, the shear strength value was 21.2 ± 3.2 MPa, in group 2 – 21.6 ± 5.2 MPa, in group 3 – 17.7 ± 6.4 MPa. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups. According to the study, a decrease in the level of adhesive force was found when using a universal adhesive without prior etching of the enamel with phosphoric acid. However, this level remained within the clinically recommended range.
CONCLUSIONS. Thus, all studied adhesive systems used in various etching techniques demonstrated high adhesive performance, providing strong adhesion of the orthodontic structure to the tooth surface.
About the Authors
H. Almokaddam
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Hayan Almokaddam – Postgraduate Student of the Department of Dentistry Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
N. S. Tuturov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Nikolay S. Tuturov – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
I. Katbeh
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Imad Katbeh – Senior Lecturer at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
A. Saleh
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Ahmad Saleh – Resident of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., Moscow 117198
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
1. Toshniwal N., Singh N., Dhanjani V., Mote N., Mani S. Self etching system v/s conventional bonding: Advantages, disadvantages. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2019;5(3):379–383. Available at: https://www.oraljournal.com/pdf/2019/vol5issue3/PartF/5-3-49-913.pdf (accessed: 14.03.2024).
2. Călinoiu Ș.G., Bîcleșanu C., Florescu A., Stoia D.I., Dumitru C., Miculescu M. Comparative study on interface fracture of 4th generation 3-steps adhesive and 7th generation universal adhesive. Materials. 2023;16(17):5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175834
3. Labunet A., Tonea A., Kui A., Sava S. The use of laser energy for etching enamel surfaces in dentistry – a scoping review. Materials. 2022;15(6):1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061988
4. Loganathan S., Santhanakrishnan S., Bathe R., Arunachalam M. Prediction of femtosecond laser ablation profile on human teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2019;34(4):693–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2644-0
5. Katyal D., Mohan R., Jain R.K., Nagesh S. Evaluation of antimicrobial and mechanical properties of a novel propolis-modified orthodontic primer: An in-vitro study. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e46716. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46716
6. Shayan A.M., Behroozian A., Sadrhaghighi A., Dolatabadi A., Hashemzadeh S. Effect of different types of acid-etching agents and adhesives on enamel discoloration during orthodontic treatment. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1):7–10. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.002
7. Smith R.T., Shivapuja R.K. The evaluation of dual cement resins in orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103(5):448–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81795-0
8. Omidkhoda M., Eslami N., Mazloum M., Entezari M. Evaluation of bond strength of orthodontic brackets using light- and chemical-cure adhesive systems over time: An in-vitro study. J Orthod Sci. 2023;12(1):6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_31_22
9. Zeller D.K., Fischer J., Rohr N. Viscous behavior of resin composite cements. Dent Mater J. 202;40(1):253–259. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-313
10. Toledano M., Osorio R., Osorio E., Romeo A., de la Higuera B., Garcia-Godoy F. Bond strength of Orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2003)0732.0.CO;2
11. Mäkinen E., Lassila L., Varrela J., Vallittu P. Light-curing of orthodontic bracket adhesive by transillumination through dentine and enamel. Biomater Investig Dent. 2019;6(1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2019.1632709
12. Shalini S., Jha A., Kashyap P., Gupta P., Rajbhoj S., Bhandari S. A Comparison of the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different orthodontic adhesives. Cureus. 2023;15(5):e39115. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39115
13. Cacciafesta V., Sfondrini M.F., Klersy C., Sfondrini G. Polymerization with a micro-xenon light of a resin-modified glass ionomer: a shear bond strength study 15 minutes after bonding. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24(6):689–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/24.6.689
14. Saritha T., Sunitha C., Chanikya S.S., Kumar P.K., Naveen R. High-intensity light-emitting diode and reduced curing times – an in vitro study. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2023;57(1):10–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742221080386
15. Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Var-gas M., Vijay P., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215–235. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12760693/ (accessed: 14.03.2024).
16. Perković V., Šimunović Aničić M., Lughi V., Pozzan L., Meštrović S., Turco G. Correlation of shear bond strength and degree of conversion in conventional and self-adhesive systems used in orthodontic bonding procedures. Biomedicines. 2023;11(5):1252. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051252
17. Sensi L.G., Lopes G.C., Monteiro S. Jr, Baratieri L.N., Vieira L.C. Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/ adhesives. Oper Dent. 2005;30(1):63–68. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15765959/ (accessed: 14.03.2024).
18. Maaßen M., Wille S., Kern M. Bond strength of adhesive luting systems to human dentin and their durability. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(1):182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.012
19. Gateva N., Gusiyska A., Stanimirov P., Raychev I., Kabaktchieva R. Biodegradation and dentin bonding effectiveness of one “Universal” self-etch adhesive used in multi-mode manner. J of IMAB. 2017;23(1):1510–1515. https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2017231.1510
20. Bourgi R., Daood U., Bijle M.N., Fawzy A., Ghaleb M., Hardan L. Reinforced universal adhesive by ribose crosslinker: A novel strategy in adhesive dentistry. Polymers. 2021;13(5):704. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050704
21. Kharouf N., Mancino D., Rapp G., Zghal J., Arntz Y., Haikel Y., Reitzer F. Does etching of the enamel with the rubbing technique promote the bond strength of a universal adhesive system? J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2020;21(10):1117–1121. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2962
22. Kharouf N., Eid A., Hardan L., Bourgi R., Arntz Y., Jmal H. et al. Antibacterial and bonding properties of universal adhesive dental polymers doped with pyrogallol. Polymers. 2021;13(10):1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101538
23. Wagner A., Wendler M., Petschelt A., Belli R., Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014;42(7):800–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012
24. Ozok A.R., Wu M.K., De Gee A.J., Wesselink P.R. Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive. Dent Mater. 2004;20(5):479–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.07.004
25. Cadenaro M., Josic U., Maravić T., Mazzitelli C., Marchesi G., Mancuso E. et al. Progress in dental adhesive materials. J Dent Res. 2023;102(3):254–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221145673
26. Bhattacharjee D., Sharma K., Sahu R., Neha K., Kumari A., Rai A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of brackets bonded with self etch primer/adhesive and conventional etch/primer and adhesive system. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13(Suppl. 2):S1168–S1173. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_412_21
27. Boudrot M., François P., Abdel-Gawad S., Attal J.P., Dantagnan C.A. Shear bond strength of a RMGIC for orthodontic bracket bonding to enamel. BDJ Open. 2024;2;10(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00181-5
28. Abu Haimed T., Osama Filfilan R., Nazih Hassoubah M., Abou Neel E.A., Bamashmous M. Cyclic shear fatigue of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using self-adhering flowable composites. Saudi Dent J. 2023;35(7):834–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.07.014
29. Iglesias A., Flores T., Moyano J., Artés M., Gil F.J., Puigdollers A. In vitro study of shear bond strength in direct and indirect bonding with three types of adhesive systems. Materials. 2020;13(11):2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112644
30. Хасан А.М., Тутуров Н.С., Иванов С.Ю., Булычева Е.А., Булычева Д.С., Катбех И.Х., Салех А. Сравнение лабораторных показателей адгезии отечественного адгезивного комплекса и зарубежного аналога. Клиническая стоматология. 2023;26(3):84–88. https://doi.org/10.37988/1811-153X_2023_3_84
31. Alqaisy A., Kabbesh K., Alawwad M., Kosyreva T.F., Katbeh I., Khasan A.M. Evaluation of the effect of sodium hypochlorite gel on composite bonding strength to enamel of primary teeth after salivary contamination: in vitro study. Stomatologiya. 2021;100(1):15–18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202110001115
32. Khasan A.M., Kosyreva T.F., Tuturov N.S., Katbeh I., Gharawi A.M., Salman I. Clinical observations of metal brackets detachment using a Russian adhesive complex. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2023;(2):58–63. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35556/idr-2023-2(103)58-63
Review
For citations:
Almokaddam H., Tuturov N.S., Katbeh I., Saleh A. Comparative evaluation of the shear strength of orthodontic adhesives for fixation of brackets. Endodontics Today. 2024;22(2):179-185. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0020
Email this article 