Comparative evaluation of accuracy of three different electronic apex locators in the presence of various endodonticirrigants: An in vitro study
https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0036
Abstract
AIM AND OBJECTIVES. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of Root ZX, Raypex6, and I Root and electronic apex locators in the presence of NaOCl (3%), Citric acid (10%), MTAD and Green tea extract as endodontic irrigants.
MATERIAL AND METHOD. Sixty single rooted human permanent teeth were used for the study. Access cavities were prepared and the teeth were decoronated. Teeth were divided as follows: Group I-Root ZX apex locator (n=20), IA – NaOCl 3% endodontic irrigant (n=5), IB – Citric Acid 10% endodontic irrigant (n=5), IC – MTAD endodontic irrigant (n=5), ID- Green Tea extract endodontic irrigant (n=5). Group II: Raypex 6 apex locator (n=20). IIA – NaOCl 3% endodontic irrigant (n=5), IIB – Citric acid 10% endodontic irrigant (n=5). IIC – MTAD endodontic irrigant (n = 5), IID – Green tea extract endodontic irrigant (n=5). Group III-i-ROOT apex locator (n=20). IIIA – NaOCl 3% endodontic irrigant (n=5), IIIB – Citric Acid 10% endodontic irrigant (n=5), IIIC – MTAD endodonticirrigant (n=5), IIID – Green tea extract endodontic irrigant (n=5). The actual working length was determined using a 15 K file and the working model was prepared using Alginate in a rectangular box. The teeth were embedded into the working model and the electronic measurements were made with each electronic apex locator. The data was collected, analyzed and subjected to statistical analysis.
RESULTS. No significant difference was found when Raypex 6 apex locator was used along with all the endodontic irrigants except green tea extract. Root ZXshowed statistically significant difference with green tea extract and MTAD. I-root showed statistically significant difference with all the irrigants except green tea extract.
CONCLUSION. Citric acid 10% was consistently accurate when assessed with all the three apex locators, whereas Green tea extract demonstrated the least accurate readings with all apex locators.
About the Authors
A. NagraniIndia
Ankita Nagrani – Former Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Pimpri, Pune-18, Maharashtra
A. B. Tandale
India
Anita B. Tandale – Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Pimpri, Pune-18, Maharashtra
S. Mulay
India
Sanjyot Mulay – Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Pimpri, Pune-18, Maharashtra
Sh. Khade
India
Shruti Khade – Former Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Pimpri, Pune-18, Maharashtra
D. Shah
India
Dhwani Shah – Former Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Pimpri, Pune-18, Maharashtra
References
1. Inoue N., Skinner D.H. A simple and accurate way of measuring root canal length. J Endod. 1985;11(10):421–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(85)80079-0
2. Plotino G., Grande N.M., Brigante L., Lesti B., Somma F. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex. Int Endod J. 2006;39(5):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01095.x
3. Ingle J.I., Bakland L.K. Endodontic cavity preparation. 5 th ed. Elsevier Inc; 2002. 405 p.
4. Ushiyama J. New principle and method for measuring the root canal length. J Endod. 1983;9(3):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(83)80105-8
5. Mull J.P., Manjunath V., Manjunath M.K. Comparison of accuracy of two electronic apex locators in the presence of various irrigants: An in vitro study. J Cons Dent. 2012;15(2):178–182. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.94585
6. Prasad A.B., Srivastava H., Srivastava A.A., Raisingani D. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators to determine working length in the presence of various irrigants. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016;26(5):457–462. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v26i5.7
7. Aydin U., Emrah K., Aksoy F., Yildirim C. In vitro evaluation of Root ZX and Raypex 6 in teeth with different apical diameters. J Cons Dent. 2015;18(1):66–69. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.148899
8. Torabinejad M., Khademi A.A., Babagoli J., Cho Y., Johnson W.B., Bozhilov K. et al. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod. 2003;29(3):170–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200303000-00002
9. Mello I., Coil J., Antoniazzi J.H. Does a final rinse to remove smear layer interfere on dentin of root canals? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(4):E47–E51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.007
10. Torabinejad M., Cho Y., Khademi A.A., Bakland L.K., Shabahang S. The effect of various concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the ability of MTAD to remove the smear layer. J Endod. 2003;29(4):233–239. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200304000-00001
11. Newberry B.M., Shabahang S., Johnson N., Aprecio R.M., Torabinejad M. The antimicrobial effect of biopure MTAD on eight strains of Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro investigation. J Endod. 2007;33(11):1352–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.006
12. Shabahang S., Pouresmail M., Torabinejad M. In vitro antimicrobial efficacy of MTAD and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 2003;29(7):450–452. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200307000-00006
13. Shabahang S., Torabinejad M. Effect of MTAD on Enterococcus faecalis-contaminated root canals of extracted human teeth. J Endod. 2003;29(9):576–579. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200309000-00008
14. Torabinejad M., Shabahang S., Aprecio R.M., Kettering J.D. The antimicrobial effect of MTAD: An in vitro investigation. J Endod. 2003;29(6):400–403. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200306000-00005
15. Mozayeni M.A., Javaheri G.H., Poorroosta P., Ashari M.A., Javaheri H.H. Effect of 17% EDTA and MTAD on intracanal smear layer removal: A scanning electron microscopic study. Aust Endod J. 2009;35(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00111.x
16. Mohammadi Z., Abbott P.V. On the local applications of antibiotics and antibiotic-based agents in endodontics and dental traumatology. Int Endod J. 2009;42(7):555–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01564.x
17. Beltz R.E., Torabinejad M., Pouresmail M. Quantitative analysis of the solubilizing action of MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and EDTA on bovine pulp and dentin. J Endod. 2003;29(5):334–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200305000-00004
18. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N. Root canal irrigants. J Cons Dent. 2010;13(4):256–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73378
19. Prabhakar J., Senthilkumar M., Priya M.S., Mahalakshmi K., Sehgal P.K., Sukumaran V.G. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (Triphala and green tea polyphenols), MTAD, and 5% sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formed on tooth substrate: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2010;36(1):83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.040
20. Selvan T. Comparison of the accuracy of root ZX mini and Raypex 6 in detecting apical constriction in human permanent maxillary anterior teeth in the presence of various irrigants using Stereomicroscope: An In Vitro study. Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, May 2015.
21. Baldi J., Victorino F., Bernades R., Moraes I., Bramante C., Garcia R., Bernardineli N. Influence of embedding media on the assessment of electronic apex locators. J Endod. 2007;33(4):476–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.024
22. Khattak O., Raidullah E., Francis M.L. A comparative assessment of the accuracy of electronic apex locator (Root ZX) in the presence of commonly used irrigating solutions. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(1):e41–e46. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51230
23. Jenkins J.A., Walker W.A., Schindler W.G., Flores C.M. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of the root ZX in the presence of various irrigants. J Endod. 2001;27(3):209–211. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200103000-00018
24. Tinaz A.C., Maden M., Aydin C., Turkoz E. The accuracy of three different electronic root canal measuring devices: an in vitro evaluation. J Oral Sci. 2002;44(2):91–95. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.44.91
25. Ebrahim A.K., Wadachi R., Suda H. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators for determining the working length of endodontically retreated teeth. Aust Endod J. 2007;33(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00049.x
26. Kuştarci A., Arslan D., Altunbaş D. In vitro comparison of working length determination using three different electronic apex locators. Dent Res J. 2014;11(5) 568–573.
27. Janeczek M., Kosior P., Piesiak-Pańczyszyn D., DudekK., Chrószcz A., Czajczyńska-Waszkiewicz A. et al. The effect of file size and type and irrigation solutions on the accuracy of electronic apex locators: An in vitro study on canine teeth. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8594087. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8594087
28. Marigo L., Gervasi G.L., Somma F., Squeo G., Castagnola R. Comparison of two electronic apex locators on human cadavers. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1547–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1644-8
29. Reynoso R.F., Nazario R.N., Rodriguez J., Bittencourt B.F., Dominguez J.A. Influence of irrigant solutions and apex locators in working length determination. J Oral Health Dent Sci. 2017;1(1):1–4.
30. Kang J.A., Kim S.K. Accuracies of seven different apex locators under various conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106(4):E57–E62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.001
31. Sakkir N., Asifulla M., Chandra V., Idris M., Razvi S., Geeta I. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators. Saudi Endod J. 2015;5(3):177–181. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-5984.163622
32. Rana A., Parekh V., Patel B., Somani M. Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of two Different Electronic Apex Locators In Presence of Various Herbal Irrigating Solutions: An in Vitro Study. IOSR JDMS. 2017;16(7):40–44. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1607094044
33. Çiçek E., Akkocan O., Furuncuoglu F. Comparison of apically extruded debris associated with several nickeltitanium systems after determining working length by apex locator. J Cons Dent. 2016;19(1):68–71. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173203
34. Jha P., Nikhil V., Raj S., Ravinder R., Mishra P. Accuracy of electronic apex locator in the presence of different irrigating solutions. Endodontology. 2021;33(4):232–236. https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_122_21
35. Cîmpean S.I., Chisnoiu R.M., Burtea A.L.C., Rotaru R., Bud M.G., Delean A.G., Pop-Ciutrilă I.S. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of three electronic apexlocators using different sodium hypochlorite concentrations. Medicina. 2023;59(5):918. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050918
36. D’Assunção F.L.C., Salazar-Silva J.R., Arnauld K.C.L., Leite T.B., Santos J.P., D’Assunção V.C.S.C., Almeida A.C. de. Evaluation of the effect of irrigants on the accuracy and repeatability of three electronic apex locators: an ex vivo study. Res Soc Dev. 2021;10(13):e599101321636. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21636
37. Alothmani O.S., Siddiqui A.Y. Accuracy of Root ZX Electronic Apex Locator in Relation to Two Different Employment Protocols: An In Vitro Study. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e44659. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44659
Review
For citations:
Nagrani A., Tandale A.B., Mulay S., Khade Sh., Shah D. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of three different electronic apex locators in the presence of various endodonticirrigants: An in vitro study. Endodontics Today. 2024;22(3):212-219. https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0036