Comparative evaluation of fluoride release among four commercially available dental restorative materials: An In-Vitro study

INTRODUCTION. Several fluoride-containing dental restoratives are currently available, including glass ionomers (GIC), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers), composites, and amalgams. The fluoride release capabilities of these materials differ due to their matrices and setting mechanisms, which in turn influence their antibacterial and cariostatic properties. Glass ionomer cements are particularly favored for their chemical bonding and fluoride release. However, their limitations include water sensitivity and reduced wear resistance, leading to the development of resinmodified glass ionomers. These materials aim to improve moisture sensitivity and mechanical strength while still providing fluoride release. Despite extensive research on fluoride release, comparative studies involving other fluoride-releasing materials are limited.
AIM. This study aims to evaluate the fluoride release of two glass ionomer cements, a compomer, and a composite resin, and to assess the impact of topical fluorides on their fluoride-releasing abilities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The present in-vitro comparative study was conducted at the College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka. Four restorative materials were evaluated over 42 days: Conventional GlIC (GC Fuji II), RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M), Compomer (Dyract AP, Dentsply), and Composite (Tetric N Ceram, Vivadent). Specimens were prepared in disc-shaped molds, immersed in deionized water, and fluoride levels measured using a fluoride ion-selective electrode at various intervals. RESULTS. The study revealed distinct fluoride release patterns among the materials. Group I demonstrated the highest fluoride release on Day 1, significantly surpassing Groups II, III, and IV (p < 0.001). While Groups I and II showed a pronounced decrease in fluoride release by Day 2, all groups exhibited a consistent decline over time, with notable intergroup differences.
CONCLUSIONS. The fluoride release characteristics of the evaluated restorative materials varied significantly, emphasizing the importance of material selection based on their fluoride-releasing capabilities to enhance dental health.

1. Roberson T., Heymann H.O., Swift E.J. Jr. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Elsevier; 2006. 1006 p.

2. Wiegand A., Buchalla W., Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials – fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):343-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022

3. Morales-Valenzuela A.A., Scougall-Vilchis R.J., Lara-Carrillo E., Garcia-Contreras R., Salmeron-Valdes E.N., Aguillón-Sol L. Comparison of fluoride release in conventional glass-ionomer cements with a new mechanical mixing cement. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020;18(2):319–323. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a44034

4. Preston A.J., Higham S.M., Agalamanyi E.A., Mair L.H. Fluoride recharge of aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26(12):936–940. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00502.x

5. Feiz A., Nicoo M.A., Parastesh A., Jafari N., Sarfaraz D. Comparison of antibacterial activity and fluoride release in tooth-colored restorative materials: Resin-modified glass ionomer, zirconomer, giomer, and cention N. Dent Res J. 2022;19:104.

6. Featherstone J.D. The continuum of dental caries – evidence for a dynamic disease process. J Dent Res. 2004;83(Suppl. 1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301s08

7. Porenczuk A., Jankiewicz B., Naurecka M., Bartosewicz B., Sierakowski B., Gozdowski D. et al. A comparison of the remineralizing potential of dental restorative materials by analyzing their fluoride release profiles. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019;28(6):815–823. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/94140

8. Kidd E.A., Toffenetti F., Mjör I.A. Secondary caries. Int Dent J. 1992;42(3):127–138.

9. Mazzaoui S.A., Burrow M.F., Tyas M.J. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with a dentin adhesive. Dent Mater. 2000;16(3):166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00003-8

10. Diaz-Arnold A.M., Holmes D.C., Wistrom D.W., Swift E.J. Jr. Short-term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater. 1995;11(2):96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80041-7

11. Mount G.J. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Glass-ionomer cements: past, present and future. Oper Dent. 1994;19(3):82–90.

12. El Mallakh B.F., Sarkar N.K. Fluoride release from glassionomer cements in de-ionized water and artificial saliva. Dent Mater. 1990;6(2):118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(05)80041-7

13. Levallois B., Fovet Y., Lapeyre L., Gal J.Y. In vitro fluoride release from restorative materials in water versus artificial saliva medium (SAGF). Dent Mater. 1998;14(6):441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00019-6

14. Randall R.C., Wilson N.H. Glass-ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res. 1999;78(2):628–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780020101

15. Okuyama K., Murata Y., Pereira P.N., Miguez P.A., Komatsu H., Sano H. Fluoride release and uptake by various dental materials after fluoride application. Am J Dent. 2006;19(2):123–127.

16. Neelakantan P., John S., Anand S., Sureshbabu N., Subbarao C. Fluoride release from a new glass-ionomer cement. Oper Dent. 2011;36(1):80–85. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-219-LR

17. Kim M.J., Lim B.S., Chang W.G., Lee Y.K., Rhee S.H., Yang H.C. Phosphoric acid incorporated with acidulated phosphate fluoride gel etchant effects on bracket bonding. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(4):678–684. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[678:PAIWAP]2.0.CO;2

18. Rothwell M., Anstice H.M., Pearson G.J. The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. J Dent. 1998;26(7):591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00035-3

19. Freedman R., Diefenderfer K.E. Effects of daily fluoride exposures on fluoride release by glass ionomer-based restoratives. Oper Dent. 2003;28(2):178–185.

20. Delikan E., Erturk-Avunduk A.T., Karatas O., Saçmacı Ş. Effect of topical fluoride applications on residual monomer release from resin-based restorative materials. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02698-x

21. Dhumal R.S., Chauhan R.S., Patil V., Rathi N., Nene K., Tirupathi S.P. et al. Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from four commercially available pediatric dental restorative materials. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;16(S-1):S6–S12.

22. Abudawood S., Donly K.J. Fluoride release and re-release from various esthetic restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2017;30(1):47–51.