Three-dimensional assessment of the relative position of the roots of the teeth in the anterior lower jaw for treatment planning for class III occlusion anomalies using mini-implants
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683–2981-2019-17-3-30-34
Abstract
Relevance. The use of skeletal support in orthodontics led to the use of elastic traction and mini-implants for upper jaw traction in class III treatment, however, when planning the placement, clinicians did not take into account the anatomical structures of individual areas, that could lead to iatrogenic damage to the endodontium and periodontium.
The aim of this study is a three-dimensional assessment of the relative position of the roots of mandibular canines and incisors when planning treatment for anomalies of class III occlusion using mini-implants.
Materials and methods. We examined 27 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in patients aged 20 to 36 years. First, the divergence angle of the longitudinal axes of the canines and lateral incisors was measured on coronary sections of CBCT. Then, according to the bisector of the angle from the anatomical cervix of the tooth, the distances between the roots were measured at the following points: 3 mm, 5 mm, 8 mm and 10 mm. Similar measurements were performed between the central incisors.
Results. The average divergence angle between the lateral incisor / canine on the right was 13.8 ± 2.82 degrees, between the lateral incisor / canine on the right 14.68 ± 2.68 degrees and 10.76 ± 2.47 degrees. The average distance between the lateral incisor / canine totaled 2.45 ± 0.4 mm at a level of 5 mm, at a level of 8 mm this distance is 2.9 ± 0.5 mm, and at a level of 10 mm – 3.26 ± 0. 6 mm.
Conclusion. The mini-implant placement in mandibula in the area between the roots of lateral incisors and canines should be carried out more apically from the anatomical cervix of the tooth more than 8 mm.
About the Authors
V. A. MazhnikovaRussian Federation
Orthodontist; graduate student
A. A. Abramyan
Russian Federation
Orthodontist
M. M. Shubitidze
Russian Federation
Orthodontist
Sh. M. Solimanov
Russian Federation
Dentist
A. O. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Dentist, Surgeon, Therapist
R. V. Volberg
Russian Federation
Dental Surgeon, Implantologist, Periodontologist
References
1. Ast D. B., Carlos J. P., Cons N. C. The prevalence and characteristics of malocclusion among senior high school students in upstate New York // Am J Orthod. 1965. №51. Р. 437-445.
2. Krogman W. M. The problem of “timing” in facial growth, with special reference to the period of the changing dentition // Am J Orthod. 1951. №37. Р. 253-276.
3. Jacobson A., Evans W. G., Preston C. B. et al. Mandibular prognathism // Am J Orthod. 1974. №66. Р. 140-171.
4. Guyer E. C., Ellis E. E., McNamara J. A. et al. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents // Angle Orthod. 1986. №56. Р. 7-30.
5. Battagel J. M. The aeitiological factors in Class III malocclusion // Eur J Orthod. 1993. №15. Р. 347-370.
6. Tollaro I. Class III malocclusions in the deciduous dentition: a morphological and correlation study // Eur J Orthod. 1994. №16. Р. 401-408.
7. Ellis Iii E., McNamara J. A. Jr. Components of adult Class III malocclusion // J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984. №42. Р. 295-305.
8. De Clerck H. J. Orthopaedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency // J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. №67. Р. 2123-2129.
9. Piao Y., Kim S. J., Yu H. S. et al. Five-year investigation of a large orthodontic patient population at a dental hospital in South Korea //. Korean J Orthod. 2016. №46. Р. 137-145.
10. Jung M. H. Age, extraction rate and jaw surgery rate in Korean orthodontic clinics and small dental hospitals // Korean J Orthod. 2012. №42. Р. 80-86.
11. Jung M. H. Total arch distalization with interproximal stripping in a patient with severe crowding // Korean J Orthod. 2019. №49 (3). Р. 194-201.
12. Kuroda S., Sugawara Y., Deguchi T. et al. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as ortho- dontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort // Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. №131. Р. 9-15.
13. Roccia F., Tavolaccini A., Dell’Acqua A. et al. An audit of mandibular fractures treated by intermaxillary fixation using intraoral cortical bone screws // J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005. №33. 251e254.
14. Schulte-Geers M., Kater W., Seeberger R. Root trauma and tooth loss through the application of pre-drilled transgingival fixation screws // Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol. 40, Issue 7, 2012, e214-e217,
15. Wilmes Benedict et al. CAD-CAM–fabricated mini-implant insertion guides for the delivery of a distalization appliance in a single appointment // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Vol. 156. Issue 1. Р. 148-156.
16. Разумова С. Н., Браго А. С., Серебров Д. В. и др. Оценка длины моляров и премоляров верхней челюсти и расстояния от верхушек этих зубов до верхнечелюстного синуса по данным конусно-лучевой компьютерной томографии (КЛКТ) в различных возрастных группах // Эндодонтия today. 2019. №2 (17). С. 47-51 Razumova S. N., Brago A. S., Serebrov D. V. et al. Estimation of the length of maxillary molars and premolars and the distance from the apexes of these teeth to the maxillary sinus according to cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in different age groups // Endodontics today. 2019. №17 (2). Р. 47-51.
17. Разумова С. Н., Браго А. С., Хасханова Л. М. Анатомия системы корневых каналов зубов нижней челюсти по данным конусно- лучевой компьютерной томографии // Эндодонтия today. 2018. №16 (4). С. 50-52. Razumova S. N., Brago A. S, Hashanova L. M. Anatomy of the root canal system of the teeth of the lower jaw according to cone-beam computed tomography // Endodontics today. 2018. №16 (4). Р.50-52.
18. Долгалев А. А., Нечаева Н. К., Аракелян Н. Г. и др. Возможности конусно-лучевой компьютерной томографии при диагностике переломов корней зубов // Эндодонтия today. 2018. №2 (16). С. 43- 47. Dolgalev A. A., Nechaeva N. K., Arakelyan N. G. et al. Possibilities of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of fractures of the roots of teeth // Endodontics today. 2018. №16 (2). Р. 43-47.
19. Schneider A. M., David L. R., De Franzo A. J. el al. Use of specialized bone screws for intermaxillary fixation // Ann Plast Surg 44: 154e157, 2000
20. Poggio P. M., Incorvati C., Velo S. et al. ‘‘Safe Zones’’: A Guide for Miniscrew Positioning in the Maxillary and Mandibular Arch // Angle Orthod. 2006. №76. Р. 191-197.
21. Schnelle M. A., Beck F. M., Jaynes R. M. et al. A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews // Angle Orthod. 2004. №74. Р. 832-837.
22. Monnerat, Cristiane et al. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014 Vol. 135. Issue 4Р. 428-429.
23. Raghavendra V., Reddy Y. M., Sreekanth C. et al. Safe Zones for Miniscrews in Orthodontics: A Comprehensive Review // Int J Dent Med Res. 2014. №1 (4). Р. 135-138.
Review
For citations:
Mazhnikova V.A., Abramyan A.A., Shubitidze M.M., Solimanov Sh.M., Kuznetsova A.O., Volberg R.V. Three-dimensional assessment of the relative position of the roots of the teeth in the anterior lower jaw for treatment planning for class III occlusion anomalies using mini-implants. Endodontics Today. 2019;17(3):30-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683–2981-2019-17-3-30-34