Исследование конструктивных параметров системы ротационных эндодонтических инструментов
Abstract
these design features carries inference about instrument properties and makes possible a comparative analysis
of instruments with different design. The aim of the present work is a quantitative study and analysis of the
FlexMaster instruments design features. Thirty instruments of different size and taper have been included in this
study. SEM examination of all instruments and their cross-sections was made to determine the following design
parameters: tip angle, fluting angle, pitch length, fluting depth, internal and external diameters and the angles of
cutting blade. Design features analysis of the FlexMaster instruments allows pointing out its outstanding characteristics:
1) good cutting efficiency; 2) high torsional resistance; 3) low flexibility; 4) aggressive tip; 5) low controllability
of cutting process due to substantial self-feeding effect.
About the Authors
Т. БеляеваRussian Federation
Е. Ржанов
Russian Federation
References
1. Yared G., Kulkarni G.K., Ghossayn F. An in vitro study of the torsional properties of new and used K3 instruments // Int Endod J. 2003. №36. Р. 764-769.
2. Ray J. J., Kirkpatrick T. C., Rutledge R. E. Cyclic fatigue of endosequence and K3 rotary files in a dynamic model // J Endod. 2007. №33 (12). Р. 1469-1472.
3. Bahia M. G. A., Melo M. C. C., Buono V. T. L. Influence of cyclic torsional loading on the fatigue resistance of K3 instruments. // Int Endod J. 2008. №41. Р. 883-891.
4. Gambarini G., Grande N.M., Plotino G., Somma F., Garala M., De Luca M., Testarelli L. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods // J Endod. 2008. №34 (8). Р. 1003-1005.
5. Melo M. C. C., Pereira E. S. J., Viana A. C. D., Fonseca A. M. A., Buono V. T. L., Bahia M. G. A. Dimensional characterization and mechanical behaviour of K3 rotary instruments // Int Endod J. 2008. №41. Р. 329-338.
6. Kell T., Azarpazhooh A., Peters O.A., El-Mowafy O., Tompson B., Basrani B. Torsional profiles of new and used 20/.06 GT series X and GT rotary endodontic instruments // J Endod. 2009. №35 (9). Р. 1278-1281.
7. Park S-Y., Cheung G. S. P., Yum J., Hur B., Park J-K., Kim H-C. Dynamic torsional resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments // J Endod. 2010. №36 (7). Р. 1200-1204.
8. Testarelli L., Grande N. M., Plotino G., Lendini M., Pongione G., De Paolis G., Rizzo F., Milana V., Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a comparative study // The Open Dentistry Journal. 2009. №3. Р. 55-58.
9. Kim H-C., Yum J., Hur B., Cheung G. S. P. Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files // J Endod. 2010. №36 (1). Р. 147-152.
10. Plotino G., Grande N. M., Cordaro M., Testarelli L., Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments // J Endod. 2009. №35 (11). Р. 1469-1476.
11. Plotino G., Grande N.M., Cordaro M., Testarelli L., Gambarini G. Influence of the shape of artificial canals on the fatigue resistance of NiTi rotary instruments // Int Endod J. 2010. №43. Р. 69-75.
12. Johnson E., Lloyd A., Kuttler S., Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 Nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments// J Endod. 2008. №34 (11). Р. 1406-1409.
13. Gao Y., Shotton V., Wilkinson K., Phillips G., Johnson W. B. Effects of raw material and rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments // J Endod. 2010. №36 (7). Р. 1205-1209.
14. Kramkowski T. R., Bahcall J. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of profile GT and profile GT series X rotary nickel-titanium files // J Endod. 2009. №35. Р. 404-407.
15. Larsen C. M., Watanabe I., Glickman G. N., He J. Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments // J Endod. 2009. №35. Р. 401-403.
16. Al-Hadlaq S. M. S., AlJarbou F. A., AlThumairy R. I. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of m-wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments // J Endod. 2010. №36 (2). Р. 305-307.
17. Cunha da Peixoto I. F., Pereira E. S. J., da Silva J. G. et al. Flexural fatigue and torsional resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT series X instruments // J Endod. 2010. №36. Р. 741-744.
18. Iqbal M. K., Floratos S., Hsu Y. K., Karabucak B. An in vitro comparison of ProFile GT and GTX nickel-titanium rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in mandibular molar // J Endod. 2010. №36. Р. 302-304.
19. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal // Dent Clin North Am. 1974. №18. Р. 269-296.
20. Беляева Т. С., Ржанов Е. А. Конструктивные особенности вращаемых (ротационных) эндодонтических инструментов // Эндодонтия. 2010. №4 (3-4). С. 3-12.
21. Beljaeva T.S., Rzhanov E.A. Konstruktivnye osobennosti vrashchaemyh (rotacionnyh) endodonticheskih instrumentov // Endodontija. 2010. №4 (3-4). S. 3-12.
22. Chow D. Y., Stover S. E., Bahcall J. K., Jaunberzins A., Toth J. M. An in vitro comparison of the rake angles between K3 and ProFile endodontic file systems // Journal of Endodontics. 2005. №31 (3). Р. 180-182.
23. Sonntag D. Schneidengeometrie und Effizienz voll-rotierender Nickel-Titan-Feilen // Endodontie. 2003. №12. S. 229-241.
Review
For citations:
, . Endodontics Today. 2012;10(1):16-25. (In Russ.)