Анализ бактерицидного действия гипохлорита натрия и хлоргексидина на резистентные микроорганизмы биопленки (E. Faecalis, C. Albicans).

Цель. Анализ актуальных данных по бактерицидной эффективности эндодонтических ирригантов, в частности гипохлорита натрия и хлоргексидина в различных концентрациях относительно элиминации резистентных микроорганизмов (E. Faecalis, C. Albicans).
Ирригация является одним из важных этапов обработки корневых каналов, который предотвращает дальнейшее контаминирование каналов микроорганизмами. Однако, ирриганты не всегда справляются с данной функцией, что приводит к возникновению вторичной инфекции.
Материалы и методы. Было произведено изучение публикаций в электронных базах данных PubMed, Google Scholar и ScienceDirect в ходе систематического обзора литературы. Включены статьи, содержание которых касается данных относительно различных ирригационных растворов и их бактерицидного действия на резистентные бактерии биопленок.
Результаты. В процессе обзора была рассмотрено 73 статьи. После анализа литературы по критериям включения, итоговое количество составило 41 публикацию.
Выводы. Согласно литературным данным, ирригационные растворы в широко используемых клиницистами концентрациях (гипохлорит натрия 3%, хлоргексидин 2%) не способны полностью устранить E. faecalis и C. Albicans из системы корневых каналов.

1. Zargar N, Marashi MA, Ashraf H, Hakopian R, Beigi P. Identification of microorganisms in persistent/secondary endodontic infections with respect to clinical and radiographic findings: bacterial culture and molecular detection. Iran J Microbiol. 2019;11(2):120-128.

2. Maryam Pourhajibagher, Roghayeh Ghorbanzadeh, Steven Parker, Nasim Chiniforush, Abbas Bahador. The evaluation of cultivable microbiota profile in patients with secondary endodontic infection before and after photo-activated disinfection. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, Volume 18, 2017, Pages 198-203.

3. M. Pourhajibagher, A. Bahador. Is antimicrobial agents can considered as effective weapons against endodontic infections by Enterococcus faecalis? Der Pharma Chemica, 7 (2015), pp. 196-200.

4. M.E. tysakowska, A. Ciebiada-Adam iec, M. Sienkiewicz, J. Sokolowski, K. Banaszek. The cultivable microbiota of primary and secondary infected root canals, their susceptibility to antibiotics and association with the signs and symptoms of infection. Int. Endod. J., 49 (2016), pp. 422-430.

5. Jhajharia K, Parolia A, Shetty KV, Mehta LK. Biofilm in endodontics: A review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(1):1-12.

6. Behnam Bolhari, Maryam Pourhajibagher, Farzaneh Bazarjani, Nasim Chiniforush, Mehdi Rostami Rad, Salma Pirmoazen, Abbas Bahador. Ex vivo assessment of synergic effect of chlorhexidine for enhancing antimicrobial photodynamic therapy efficiency on expression patterns of biofilm-associated genes of Enterococcus faecalis. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, Volume 22, 2018, Pages 227-232.

7. Pourhajibagher, Maryam, Ghorbanzadeh, Roghayeh, & Bahador, Abbas. (2017). Culture-dependent approaches to explore the prevalence of root canal pathogens from endodontic infections. Brazilian Oral Research, 31, e108. Epub December 18, 2017.

8. Wei-hu Ye, Bing Fan, Wiley Purcell, Mohamed M. Meghil, Christopher W. Cutler, Brian E. Bergeron, Jing-zhi Ma, Franklin R. Tay, Li-na Niu. Anti-biofilm efficacy of root canal irrigants against in-situ Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in root canals, isthmuses and dentinal tubules. Journal of Dentistry, Volume 79, 2018, Pages 68-76.

9. Sun, X., Wang, S., Yang, Y. et al. Study of invasion and colonization of E. faecalis in microtubes by a novel device. Biomed Microdevices 18, 82 (2016).

10. Mallya L, Shenoy R, Mala K, Shenoy S. Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of 20% Punica granatum, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite used alone or in combinations against Enterococcus faecalis: An in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(4):367-370.

11. Tong, Z., Du, Y., Ling, J., Huang, L., & Ma, J. (2017). Relevance of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats of Enterococcus faecalis strains isolated from retreatment root canals on periapical lesions, resistance to irrigants and biofilms. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 14, 5491-5496.

12. Diogo Patncia, Fernandes Chantal, Caramelo Francisco, Mota Marta, Miranda Isabel M., Faustino M. A. F., Neves M. G. P. M. S., Uliana Marciana P., de Oliveira Kleber T., Santos Joao M., Goncalves Teresa. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy against Endodontic Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans Mono and Mixed Biofilms in the Presence of Photosensitizers: A Comparative Study with Classical Endodontic Irrigants. Frontiers in Microbiology, Volume 8, 2017, page 498.

13. Neelakantan, P.; Romero, M.; Vera, J.; Daood, U.; Khan, A.U.; Yan, A.; Cheung, G.S.P. Biofilms in Endodontics-Current Status and Future Directions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1748.

14. Ghivari SB, Bhattacharya H, Bhat KG, Pujar MA. Antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigants against biofilm forming pathogens- An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(3):147-151.

15. Jose J, Krishnamma S, Peedikayil F, Aman S, Tomy N, Mariodan JP. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of QMiX, 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine, Guava Leaf Extract and Aloevera Extract Against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans -An in-vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(5):ZC20-ZC23.

16. Giardino L, Estrela C, Generali L, Mohammadi Z, Asgary S. The in vitro Effect of Irrigants with Low Surface Tension on Enterococcus faecalis. Iran Endod J. 2015;10(3):174-178.

17. Karkare SR, Ahire NP, Khedkar SU. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of hydroalcoholic extract of Aloe vera, garlic, and 5% sodium hypochlorite as root canal irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015;33:274-8.

18. Ravinanthanan M, Hegde MN, Shetty VA, Kumari S. Antimicrobial assay of combination surfactant irrigant regimen on vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. An in vitro direct contact test. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018;15(6):397-403.

19. Babaji P, Jagtap K, Lau H, Bansal N, Thajuraj S, Sondhi P. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial effect of herbal root canal irrigants (Morinda citrifolia, Azadirachta indica, Aloe vera) with sodium hypochlorite: An in vitro study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(3):196-199.

20. de Almeida J, Cechella BC, Bernardi AV, de Lima Pimenta A, Felippe WT. Effectiveness of nanoparticles solutions and conventional endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:347-51.

21. Sundus Bukhary, Hanan Balto. Antibacterial Efficacy of Octenisept, Alexidine, Chlorhexidine, and Sodium Hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms. Journal of Endodontics, Volume 43, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 643-647.

22. Wei-hu Ye, Bing Fan, Wiley Purcell, Mohamed M. Meghil, Christopher W. Cutler, Brian E. Bergeron, Jing-zhi Ma, Franklin R. Tay, Li-na Niu. Anti-biofilm efficacy of root canal irrigants against in-situ Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in root canals, isthmuses and dentinal tubules, Journal of Dentistry, Volume 79, 2018, Pages 68-76.

23. Yadav, P., Chaudhary, S., Saxena, R. K., Talwar, S., & Yadav, S. (2017). Evaluation of Antimicrobial and Antifungal efficacy of Chitosan as endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus Faecalis and Candida Albicans Biofilm formed on tooth substrate. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 9(3), e361-e367.

24. Flach, N., Bottcher, D.E., Parolo, C.C.F., Firmino, L.B., Malt, M., Lammers, M.L. and Grecca, F.S. (2016), Confocal microscopy evaluation of the effect of irrigants on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: An in vitro study. Scanning, 38: 57-62.

25. Frough-Reyhani M, Ghasemi N, Soroush-Barhaghi M, Amini M, Gholizadeh Y. Antimicrobial efficacy of different concentration of sodium hypochlorite on the biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis at different stages of development. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(5):e480-e484.

26. Zhang, R., Chen, M., Lu, Y. et al. Antibacterial and residual antimicrobial activities against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm: A comparison between EDTA, chlorhexidine, cetrimide, MTAD and QMix. Sci Rep 5, 12944 (2015).

27. Daiana Elisabeth Bottcher, Nicole T. Sehnem, Francisco Montagner, Clarissa Cavalcanti Fatturi Parolo, Fabiana Soares Grecca. Evaluation of the Effect of Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm on the 2% Chlorhexidine Substantivity: An In Vitro Study, Journal of Endodontics, Volume 41, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1364-1370.

28. Sedigh-Shams M, Badiee P, Adl A, Sarab MD, Abbaszadegan A, Nabavizadeh M. In vitro comparison of antimicrobial effect of sodium hypochlorite solution and Zataria multiflora essential oil as irrigants in root canals contaminated with Candida albicans. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(1):101-105.

29. Mergoni, G., Percudani, D., Lodi, G., Bertani, P., & Manfredi, M. (2018). Prevalence of Candida species in endodontic infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Endodontics, 44, 1616-1625.e9.

30. Vouzara T, Koulaouzidou E, Ziouti F, Economides N. Combined and independent cytotoxicity of sodium hypochlo- rite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and chlorhexidine. Int Endod J 2016;49:764-773.

31. Scott MB 2nd, Zilinski GS, Kirkpatrick TC, Himel VT, Sabey KA, Lallier TE. The effects of irrigants on the sur- vival of human stem cells of the apical papilla, including endocyn. J Endod 2018;44:263-268.

32. Jinglei Ma, Zhongchun Tong, Junqi Ling, Hongyan Liu, Xi Wei. The effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine irrigants on the antibacterial activities of alkaline media against Enterococcus faecalis. Archives of Oral Biology, Volume 60, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1075-1081.

33. Alshanta, O.A.; Shaban, S.; Nile, C.J.; McLean, W.; Ramage, G. Candida albicans Biofilm Heterogeneity and Tolerance of Clinical Isolates: Implications for Secondary Endodontic Infections. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 204.

34. Leila Moradi Eslami, Mehdi Vatanpour, Neda Aminzadeh, Payman Mehrvarzfar, Soudabeh Taheri. The comparison of intracanal medicaments, diode laser and photodynamic therapy on removing the biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans in the root canal system (ex-vivo study). Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, Volume 26, 2019, Pages 157-161.

35. Roy, Monojit, and Tirthankar Bhaumik. Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of 3% Sodium hypochlorite, 17% Ethelene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) and Fluconazole on Candida Albicans-An in vitro study. International Journal of Innovative Research In Dental Sciences 2.6 (2017): 5.

36. Mohammadi Z., Asgary S., Antifungal Activity of Endodontic Irrigants, IEJ Iranian Endodontic Journal 2015;10(2): 144-147.

37. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, P.. Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern.. Med, 151 (2009), pp. 264-269.

38. Higgins J.P.T., Altman D.G. In: Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies. Higgins J.P.T., Green S., editors. Wiley Blackwellm; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2008. [Google Scholar]

39. Higgins J.P.T., Altman D.G., G0tzsche P.C., Juni P., Moher D., Oxman A.D., Savovic J., Schulz K.F., Weeks L., Sterne J.A. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.

40. Ismail, Sajeela, Amith Adyanthaya, and Natta Sreelakshmi. Intracanal irrigants in pediatric endodontics: A review. Int J Appl Dent Sci 3.4 (2017): 246-251.

41. Cumbo, Enzo, Dario Melilli, and Giuseppe Gallina. Irrigants in endodontics: A review. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry 12.1 (2019): 37-62.