Preview

Эндодонтия Today

Расширенный поиск

Deep margin elevation: a systematic review

https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2021-19-3-175-183

Полный текст:

Аннотация

Deep margin elevation (DME) is a nonsurgical, alternative technique of dental crown lengthening. Portion of direct restoration placed only at the deep apical part of the cavity to elevate the margin to a more coronal and more adequate position for final cementation of indirect restoration.
Materials and methods. In this systematic review, we were looking for in vitro studies in which deep margin elevation (DME) technique were used. The electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE were used for the search. The search began on July 29, 2021 and ended on August 10, 2021. We have analyzed the materials and methods of each research and entered them in the appropriate tables to give a clearer assessment of the obtained results.
Results. Analysis of marginal quality showed the best results when indirect restorations luted to dentin directly and with DME technique with three consecutive layers of resin composite. In groups without DME there were fewer microleakage. DME did not statistically significantly influence the fracture strength.
Conclusions. We conducted a systematic review that included 12 in vitro studies. Even though samples without DME showed better results in in vitro studies, the difference between samples with and without DME was not statistically significant. However, in clinical practice, DME facilitates the insertion of indirect restorations. Therefore, further studies and clinical observations are necessary. 

Об авторах

Z. S. Khabadze
Peoplesl Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Россия

Zurab S. Khabadze, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

Moscow



I. V. Bagdasarova
Peoplesl Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Россия

Inna V. Bagdasarova, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

Moscow



E. S. Shilyaeva
Peoplesl Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Россия

Ekaterina S. Shilyaeva, student

Moscow



A. P. Kotelnikova
Peoplesl Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Россия

Alexandra P. Kotelnikova, student

Moscow



D. A. Nazarova
Peoplesl Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Россия

Daria A. Nazarova, student

Moscow



Yu. A. Bakayev
Peoplesl Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Россия

Yusup A. Bakayev, resident student

Moscow



S. M. Abdulkerimova
National Medical Research Center of Dentistry and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Россия

Saida M. Abdulkerimova, resident student

Moscow



Список литературы

1. Mangani F., Marini S., Barabanti N., Preti A, Cerutti A. The success of indirect restorations in posterior teeth: a system atic review of the literature. Minerva Stomatol. 2015; 64 (5): 231-40.

2. Da Silva Goncalves D., Cura M., Ceballos L, Fuentes M. V. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of com posite inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21 (1): 247-254.

3. Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatm ent approach. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010; 5 (1): 50-76.

4. Barone A., Derchi G., Rossi A., Marconcini S., Covani U. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded com posite inlays: a 3-year study. Quintessence International. 2008; 39: 65-71.

5. Dietschi D., Olsburgh S., Krejci I., Davidson C. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II com posite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003; 111 (1): 73-80.

6. Roggendorf M. J., Kramer N., Dippold C., Vosen V. E., Naumann M., Jablonski-Momeni A., Frankenberger R. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin com posite on marginal quality of resin com posite inlays in vitro. J Dent. 2012; 40 (12): 1068-73.

7. Zaruba M., Gohring T. N., Wegehaupt F. J., Attin T. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramicm inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71 (2): 317-24.

8. Frankenberger R., Hehn J., Hajto J., Kramer N., Naumann M., Koch A., Roggendorf M. J. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin com posite on marginal quality of ceram ic inlays in vitro. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17 (1): 177-83.

9. Ilgenstein I., Zitzmann N. U., Buhler J., Wegehaupt F. J., Attin T., Weiger R., Krastl G. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or com posite onlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19 (5): 1021-8.

10. Magne, Pascal, and Roberto C. Spreafico. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012; 86-96.

11. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998; 10 (1): 47-54.

12. Chen Y. C., Lin C. L., Hou C. H. Investigating inlay designs of class II cavity with deep margin elevation using finite elem ent method. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21 (1): 264.

13. Ferrari M., Koken S., Grandini S., Ferrari Cagidiaco E., Joda T., Discepoli N. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial. J Dent. 2018; 69: 70-76.

14. Rocca G. T., Gregor L., Sandoval M. J., Krejci I., Dietschi D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II com posite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatm ents. "Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect com posite restorations” . Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16 (5): 1385-93.

15. Higgins J. P. T., Altman D. G. Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies. Hoboken, N. J., USA: Wiley Blackwellm 2008.

16. Higgins J. P. T., Altman D. G., Gøtzsche PeCt, al.The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928.

17. Sterne J. A., Hernan M. A., Reeves B. C., Savovic J., Berkman N. D., Viswanathan M., et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in nonrandomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355:1491

18. Bresser R. A., van de Geer L., Gerdolle D., Schepke U., Cune M. S., Gresnigt M. M. M. Influence of Deep Margin Elevation and preparation design on the fracture strength of indirectly restored molars. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020; 110: 103950.

19. Muller V., Friedl K. H., Friedl K., Hahnel S., Handel G., Lang R. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21 (2): 607-612.

20. Grubbs T. D., Vargas M., Kolker J., Teixeira E. C. Efficacy of Direct Restorative Materials in Proximal Box Elevation on the Margin Quality and Fracture Resistance of Molars Restored With CAD/CAM Onlays. Oper Dent. 2020;45 (1): 52-61.

21. Zhang H., Li H., Cong Q., Zhang Z., Du A., Wang Y. Effect of proximal box elevation on fracture resistance and microleakage of premolars restored with ceramic endocrowns. PLoS One. 2021;16 (5): e0252269.

22. Köken S., Juloski J., Sorrentino R., Grandini S., Ferrari M. Marginal sealing of relocated cervical margins of mesio-occluso-distal overlays. J Oral Sci. 2018; 60 (3): 460-468.

23. Spreafico R., Marchesi G., Turco G., Frassetto A., Di Lenarda R., Mazzoni A., Cadenaro M., Breschi L. Evaluation of the In Vitro Effects of Cervical Marginal Relocation Using Composite Resins on the Marginal Quality of CAD/CAM Crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2016; 18 (4): 355-62.

24. Juloski J., Köken S, Ferrari M. No correlation between two methodological approaches applied to evaluate cervical margin relocation. Dent Mater J. 2020; 39 (4): 624-632.

25. 20. Frankenberger R., Kramer N., Pelka M., Petschelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang form ation of direct class II resin com posite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 1999; 3: 208-215

26. Attar N., Tam L. E., McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin com posites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003; 69 (8): 516-21.

27. Pallesen U., Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7 (2): 71-9.

28. Frankenberger R., Kramer N., Appelt A., Lohbauer U., Naumann M., Roggendorf M. J. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of tem porary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity. Dent Mater. 2011; 27 (9): 892-8.

29. Mehl A., Kunzelmann K., Folwaczny M., Hickel R. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceram ic restorations in extended MOD cavities. J Adhes Dent. 2004; 6: 239-245.

30. Frankenberger R., Reinelt C., Petschelt A., Kramer N. O perator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 960-968.

31. Pallesen U., Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003; 7: 71-9.

32. Soh M. S., Yap A. U. J., Siow K. S. () The effectiveness of cure of LED and halogen curing lights at varying cavity depths. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 707-715.

33. El-Mowafy O. M., Rubo M. H. () Influence of com posite inlay/onlay thickness on hardening of dual-cured resin cem ents. J Can Dental Assoc. 2000; 66: 147.

34. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded resin com posite restorations. Dent Mater. 1991; 7: 107-113.


Для цитирования:


Khabadze Z.S., Bagdasarova I.V., Shilyaeva E.S., Kotelnikova A.P., Nazarova D.A., Bakayev Y.A., Abdulkerimova S.M. Deep margin elevation: a systematic review. Эндодонтия Today. 2021;19(3):175-183. https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2021-19-3-175-183

For citation:


Khabadze Z.S., Bagdasarova I.V., Shilyaeva E.S., Kotelnikova A.P., Nazarova D.A., Bakayev Yu.A., Abdulkerimova S.M. Deep margin elevation: a systematic review. Endodontics Today. 2021;19(3):175-183. https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2021-19-3-175-183

Просмотров: 425


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-2981 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7242 (Online)