Clinical direct posterior restoration in aesthetic and functional aspect
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2022-20-1-47-50
Abstract
Direct restoration is one of the most common methods of rehabilitation of defects in teeth hard tissues. Composite nano-ceramic restorations are an alternative to traditional prosthetic treatment in view of the growing demand for minimally invasive technologies, since crowns or other prosthetic restorations imply a significant loss of tooth structure with macro-mechanical and more invasive preparation of the dental tissues. This article represents a clinical case of direct composite restoration in carious teeth 3.6,3.7 with aesthetic and functional rehabilitation of contact points.
About the Authors
A. V. MitroninRussian Federation
Alexander V. Mitronin – professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Dean of the Faculty of Dentistry, Head of the Department, Honored Doctor of Russian Federation.
20с1, Delegatskaya st, Moscow, 27473
Competing Interests:
is the editor-in-chief of the journal, however, it was excluded in the double-blind peer review process
D. A. Ostanina
Russian Federation
Diana A. Ostanina – assistant.
20с1, Delegatskaya st, Moscow, 27473
Competing Interests:
none
Kh. N. Eshnazarov
Russian Federation
Khisrav H. Eshnazarov – participant of Russian national competition in Global Clinical Case Contest 2021, student. Department of Cariology and Endodontics.
20с1, Delegatskaya st, Moscow, 27473
Competing Interests:
none
References
1. Nikolaev A.I., Gilmiyarov E.M., Mitronin A.V., Sadovsky V.V. Evaluation criteria for composite dental restorations. Monograph. Evaluation criteria for composite dental restorations. MEDpress- inform, 2015.
2. Mitronin A.V., Chunikhin A.A., Abaev Z.M., Basova A.A., Grishin S.Yu., Primerova A.S., Savina N.P. The use of a silorane-based composite material in the restorative therapy of chewing teeth. Cathedra – Cathedra. Dental education. 2014;49:32-36.
3. Petersen P.E., Kuzmina E.M. The prevalence of dental diseases. Risk factors and oral health. Major public health issues. Dental forum. 2017;1:2-11.
4. Askar H., Krois J., Göstemeyer G. et al. Secondary caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed?. Clin Oral Invest. 2020;24:1869–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03268-7.
5. Mitronin A.V., Grishin S.Yu., Ostanina D.A. The reliability of assessing the quality of aesthetic dental restoration: an objective or subjective approach. Endodontics today. 2018;4:40-45.
6. Vanini, L. Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract. Periodontics Aesthetic Dent. 1996;8:684.
7. Rondoni D. The course of time in dental morphology. Int Dent S Afr Australas Ed 2006; 1(2): 76-81.
8. Mitronin A., Ostanina D., Ruzina A., Khvorostenko O. Aesthetic rehabilitation of posterior teeth with direct composite restorations (a case report). Endodontics today. 2021;19(3):188-189.https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2021-19-3-188-189
9. Patrusheva M.S., Mikhalchenko A.V., Mikhalchenko V.F. Clinical efficacy assessment of masticatory teeth restoration with the use of different nanocomposite types. Volgograd Scientific Medical Journal. 2021;2:42-47.
Review
For citations:
Mitronin A.V., Ostanina D.A., Eshnazarov Kh.N. Clinical direct posterior restoration in aesthetic and functional aspect. Endodontics Today. 2022;20(1):47-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2022-20-1-47-50