Results of the determination of prevalence and intensities of included occlusion defects chewing localization, complicated convergences of the teeth their limiting

AIM. Analyses the factors of prevalence and intensities of included occlusion defects chewing-oriented of localizations, complicated convergences teeth their limiting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In examined group entered dentistry patients with included occlusion defects of the teeth row small and average extent and convergences teeth their limiting in appoximal-medial and appoximal-distal direction. In depending of secondary deforming the position teeth, limiting defect of the teeth rows, examined patients were divided into 2 groups: in the group 1 entered the examined patients (686 persons) with small extent included of occlusion defect and convergences teeth their limiting in appoximalmedial direction; group 2 have formed the patients (287 persons) with included defect small and average extent and with convergences teeth their limiting in appoximal-distal direction.

RESULTS. The factors of prevalence included defect of the teeth row small and average extent has a reliable trend to reduction in depending of age factor. Revealed by us regularity comparatively age category of the reduction occlusion defects explained that, in the course of studies were taken into account only included defects small and average extent of chewing localization, with one positions, and were not taken into account presence ended and greater defect of the teeth row – with another.

CONCLUSION. With increase of the age patient reduction of intensities occlusion defects of chewing localization, complicated convergences teeth their limiting in the age 30–39 years forms 0.36 ± 0.10 units, in comparison with 20–29 year patient. Reduction of intensities of the abovementioned factor in following age group, in contrast with previous group, has formed accordingly 0.74 ± 0.09, 0.59 ± 0.09 and 1.19 ± 0.07 units.

1. Vasilyuk V.P., Shtraube G.I., Chetvertnykh V.A., Fayzrakhmanov R.A., Dolgova E.V. Retrospective research defects and deformities of jaw. Ural Medical Journal. 2019;(12):26–29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2019.12.08

2. Karimov S.M., Sultanov M.Sh. Motivation of the choice orthopedic design under secondary adenty. Bulletin of the Tajik National University. Series of Natural Sciences. 2015;(1-5-2):112–114. (In Russ.)

3. Gorbunkova A., Pagni G., Brizhak A., Farronato G., Rasperini G. Impact of orthodontic treatment on periodontal tissues: a narrative review of multidisciplinary literature. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:4723589. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4723589

4. Ilyin S.V., Grebnev G.A., Tegza V.Yu. Methods of dental rehabilitation for full and secondary edence in military services and attached contingent in military medical institutions. Medicine and Education. 2021;(2):20–22. (In Russ.)

5. Cavallaro J. Jr, Greenstein B., Greenstein G. Clinical methodologies for achieving primary dental implant stability: the effects of alveolar bone density. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(11):1366–1372. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0071

6. Williams D.F. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941–2953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023