Preview

Endodontics Today

Advanced search

Comparative estimation efficiency treatment of patients with occlusion defects chewing-oriented localization of average extent, complicated convergence of the teeth their limiting, on dentistry factor quality of life’s

https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0137

Abstract

AIM. Study dentistry factors of life’s quality beside patient with occlusion defects chewing-oriented localizations of average extent in dynamic of prosthetic treatments with or without using of implant designs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In open controlled unrandomized study analyzed condition of dentistry status, system health and dentistry factors life’s quality 132 patients, addressed for the reason prostheses in connection of absence chewing-oriented groups teeth. In depending of elected methodical approach to orthopedic treatment patients were divided into groups: main (fixed implant’s prosthesis at presence lateral occlusion defect average extent, complicated convergence teeth their limiting) – 59 patients; comparison (traditional fixed prosthesis at presence lateral occlusion defects average extent, complicated convergence teeth their limiting) – 73 patients. Beside the first and the second group patients after corresponding treatment by psychometric method, on 5-balls scale independent estimation of Global Rating Satisfaction (GRS), defined success adaptation to fixed prosthetic device: from 1 ball – under successful adaptation, absolute complacency direct result prostheses, before 5 – under absolute dissatisfaction of the patient by quality of the prosthetic device and problem to adaptation even on background conducted correction action. For estimation life’s quality patient both groups used unfolded Russian-language version special questionnaire “Profile of the influence dentistry health” OHIP-49-RU.

RESULTS. On termination prosthetic treatment of occlusion defects chewing-oriented localizations t average extent, complicated convergence teeth their limiting, at remote periods of the observation practically all patients as a whole were satisfied his results. However, more expressing success in part of the velocities of the achievement of the high factors to complacency by result prosthesis’s treatments noted beside persons, havening prosthetic devices with handhold on implants, in contrast with patient of the group of the comparison, beside which complacency traditional fixed prosthesis even criterion “relative” corresponded to for final period of the observation and objected the factor GRS 4.4 ± 0.4 ball. Through 6–12 months factor ΣOHIP-49-RU beside persons of the first group has formed 17.2 ± 7.2 ball, then beside patient of the group of the comparison importance given factor in 2.4 times turned out to be more (41.6 ± 1.4 ball) that reflected the advantage a prosthetic treatments with using of dental implants.

CONCLUSIONS. Complex estimation efficiency of prosthetic treatments patient with occlusion defect chewing-oriented localizations average extent, complicated convergence of teeth their limiting, must include the detailed analysis of its influence upon dentistry factors life’s quality. Successful prosthetic treatment of patient with named defect is accompanied positive track record on dentistry index life’s quality (OHIP-49-RU) and factor to complacency by prosthesis (GRS) for all period of the observation, realistically more expressing beside persons, having implant’s designs.

About the Authors

G. G. Ashurov
Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere of the Republic of Tajikistan
Tajikistan

Gayur G. Ashurov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

59 Somoni Ave, Dushanbe, 734026, Republic of Tajikistan


Competing Interests:

The authors report no conflict of interest.



D. A. Zaripov
Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere of the Republic of Tajikistan
Tajikistan

Dzhovid A. Zaripov – PhD applicant, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

59 Somoni Ave, Dushanbe, 734026, Republic of Tajikistan


Competing Interests:

The authors report no conflict of interest.



S. M. Karimov
Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere of the Republic of Tajikistan
Tajikistan

Safarakhmad M. Karimov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

59 Somoni Ave, Dushanbe, 734026, Republic of Tajikistan


Competing Interests:

The authors report no conflict of interest.



A. A. Ismoilov
Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere of the Republic of Tajikistan
Tajikistan

Abdurakhim A. Ismoilov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

59 Somoni Ave, Dushanbe, 734026, Republic of Tajikistan


Competing Interests:

The authors report no conflict of interest.



G. E. Mullodzhanov
Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere of the Republic of Tajikistan
Tajikistan

Gairatzhon E. Mullodzhanov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

59 Somoni Ave, Dushanbe, 734026, Republic of Tajikistan


Competing Interests:

The authors report no conflict of interest.



D. T. Makhmudov
Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere of the Republic of Tajikistan
Tajikistan

Dzhurabek T. Makhmudov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

59 Somoni Ave, Dushanbe, 734026, Republic of Tajikistan


Competing Interests:

The authors report no conflict of interest.



A. S. Abdullayev
Samarkand State Medical University
Uzbekistan

Afzal S. Abdullayev – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery

18 Amir Temur ko’chasi Str., Samarqand, 140100, Republic of Uzbekistan


Competing Interests:

The authors report no conflict of interest.



References

1. Sharipov Kh.S., Zaripov A.R., Gurezov M.R. Estimation regenerators processes of nearradix destruction of teeth, serving full tilt of fixed orthopedic design. Herald of the Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere. 2020;(2):59–65. (In Russ.)

2. Shafozoda M.B., Karimov S.M., Odinaev I.S. Analysis of the source condition of unremoved dentures and marginal parodont of supporting teeth in the system of orthopedic design. Herald of the Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere. 2020;(1):86–90. (In Russ.)

3. De Backer H., Van Maele G., De Moor N., Van den Berghe L. Long-term results of short-span versus long-span fixed dental prostheses: an up to 20-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(1):75–85.

4. Nota A., Tecco S., Cioffi C., Beraldi A., Padulo J., Baldini A. Occlusion time analysis in military pilots affected by bruxism. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1408. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38166-2

5. Shafozoda M.B., Karimov S.M., Ashurov G.G. Structured-motivated estimation of the behaviour of patient with parodontal pathology, inducted fixed orthopedic prosthetic device. Science and Innovation. 2020;(2):5–10. (In Russ.)

6. Pjetursson B.E., Sailer I., Zwahlen M., Hämmerle C.H. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(S3):73–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01467.x

7. Raigrodski A.J., Chiche G.J., Swift E.J. Jr. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures, Part III: clinical studies. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14(5):313–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00527.x

8. Valderhaug J. Periodontal conditions and carious lesions following the insertion of fixed prostheses: a 10-year follow-up study. Int Dent J. 1980;30(4):296–304.

9. Layton D. A critical appraisal of the survival and complication rates of tooth-supported all-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: the application of evidence-based dentistry. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(5):417–427.

10. Sailer I., Pjetursson B.E., Zwahlen M., Hämmerle C.H. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(S3):86–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01468.x

11. Pjetursson B.E., Lang N.P. Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(S1):72–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01824.x

12. Mukhamedov Sh.Sh., Ashurov G.G. Results of the study of hydrodynamic’s marginal parodont of vitaly and devitaly supporting teeth in systems of metalceramic designs. Herald of the Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere. 2016;(3):31–34. (In Russ.)

13. Saburov S.K., Zaripov A.R. Integral parameters of the results of orthopedic treatment of somatic patients depending on the location of the ceramic metal crowns. Herald of the Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere. 2018;(3):59–63. (In Russ.)

14. Makhmudov D.T., Karimov S.M., Ibragimov I.U. Estimation results of the emotional-behavioral state of patients with combined dental pathology depending on the level of habitated motor activity. Herald of the Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere. 2021;(1):32–36. (In Russ.)

15. Mullodzhonova A.G., Ashurov G.G., Turaev N.G., Sadikov F.M. Track record of life’s quality dentistry aspect of health beside patients with radio-induced xerostomy. Herald of the Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere. 2021;(2):52–57. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Ashurov G.G., Zaripov D.A., Karimov S.M., Ismoilov A.A., Mullodzhanov G.E., Makhmudov D.T., Abdullayev A.S. Comparative estimation efficiency treatment of patients with occlusion defects chewing-oriented localization of average extent, complicated convergence of the teeth their limiting, on dentistry factor quality of life’s. Endodontics Today. https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0137



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-2981 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7242 (Online)