Gender-related response to different wavelength low-level laser therapy in orthodontic mandibular canine movement: a split mouth study
https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0159
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), known as photobiomodulation (PBM), has recently attracted the attention of clinicians to speed up orthodontic tooth movement. Nevertheless, the sex-related effects of LLLT have not been investigated yet, although the role of sex hormones on bone remodeling has already been reported. The objective of this study was to determine if LLLT preferentially accelerates the rate of mandibular canine retraction in men or women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty systemically healthy patients (10 male, 10 females; age range from 18 to 25 years) who were undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment were included in a split-mouth randomized control trial. Subjects were stratified into two groups: Group 1 (n = 10) was treated with 650 nm LLLT on the experimental side, while group 2 (n = 10) was treated with 976 nm LLLT. Opposite sides of the animals were used as a sham-irradiated control. PBM parameters were compatible (8 J/cm2 energy density, 0.26 W/cm2 power density) and administered on d 0, 3, 7, 14, then bi-weekly thereafter. Retraction of canine was done with 150 g force produced by elastics. Amount of linear tooth movement was evaluated at 1 month and space closure duration was monitored until complete closure.
RESULTS. The amount of the canine movement was significantly higher on LLLT treated sides compared to control ones after 1 month (p < 0.001, mean difference: 0.92 ± 0.46 mm; 1.44 ± 0.29 mm vs control sides, respectively). Better acceleration was obtained at 976 nm (1.12 ± 0.44 mm gain) vs. 650 nm (0.71 ± 0.39 mm; p < 0.001). LLLT sides closed spaces in 3.3 months, whereas controls took 6.2 months for complete closure. Sex stratification found that the accelerations were consistently higher in waves for both males and females indicating no sex-by-wavelength interactions.
CONCLUSIONS. LLLT efficiently speeds up the retraction of the mandibular canine, and the 976 nm wavelength works best. Sex does not affect the effectiveness of LLLT, which supports the consistent use of similar procedures across different groups of patients.
About the Author
A. AlhumadiIraq
Almustafa Alhumadi – Department of Pediatric, Orthodontics & Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry
Najaf, Iraq
Competing Interests:
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
1. Alzahrani A.M., Aljibrin F.J., Alqahtani A.M., Saklou R., Alhassan I.A., Alamer A.H. et al. Photobiomodulation in orthodontics: Mechanisms and clinical efficacy for faster tooth movement. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e59061. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59061
2. Tunheim E.G., Skallevold H.E., Rokaya D. Role of hormones in bone remodeling in the craniofacial complex: A review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023;13(2):210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.01.009
3. Almidfa N.S.S., Athanasiou A.E., Makrygiannakis M.A., Kaklamanos E.G. Does the rate of orthodontic tooth movement change during the estrus cycle? A systematic review based on animal studies. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):526. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01875-8
4. Pérignon B., Bandiaky O.N., Fromont-Colson C., Renaudin S., Peré M., Badran Z. et al. Effect of 970 nm low-level laser therapy on orthodontic tooth movement during Class II intermaxillary elastics treatment: a RCT. Sci Rep. 2021;11:23226. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02610-7
5. Sedej A., Svetina N., Golez A., Cankar K., Ban Frangez H., Frangez I. et al. Effect of led photobiomodulation on tooth movement, gingival hypertrophy and pain in response to treatment with fixed orthodontic appliance. Lasers Med Sci. 2025;40(1):200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04444-5
6. Akın Ş., Camcı H. Three-dimensional assessment of two different canine retraction techniques: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Prog Orthod. 2021;22(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00374-4
7. Eid F.Y., El-Kenany W.A., Mowafy M.I., El-Kalza A.R., Guindi M.A. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of two low-level laser irradiation protocols on the rate of canine retraction. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):10074. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14280-0
8. Cronshaw M., Parker S., Anagnostaki E., Mylona V., Lynch E., Grootveld M. Photobiomodulation dose parameters in dentistry: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent J. 2020;8(4):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8040114
9. Zheng D.-H., Du Y.-Q., Zhang Q.-Q., Hou F.-C., Niu S.-Q., Zang Y.-J., Li B. Effect of low-level laser therapy on orthodontic dental alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2023;38(1):184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03835-w
10. Vafaeinezhad Z., Sarandili S., Mousavi S., Mirmohammadkhani M., Rahmanian M. Assessment of changes in menstrual pattern, menstrual volume, and sex hormones (FSH, LH, TSH, prolactin, and AMH) in women of childbearing age with COVID-19 in Semnan, Iran: a cross-sectional study. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2025;30(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-025-00214-z
11. Deng L, Guo Y. Estrogen effects on orthodontic tooth movement and orthodontically-induced root resorption. Arch Oral Biol. 2020;118:104840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.104840
12. Al-Kufi H.M., Alhumadi A., Huthiafa S.M. A comparative evaluation of postoperative re-pigmentation following gingival depigmentation using a 940-nm diode laser and abrasion method: “method: a split-mouth study”. Laser Dent Sci. 2024;8(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41547-023-00208-y
13. Zhao Y., Qian S., Zheng Z., Peng J., Liu J., Guan X., Liao C. Consideration of hormonal changes for orthodontic treatment during pregnancy and lactation – a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024;22(1):106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-024-01281-z
14. Gonçalves A., Monteiro F., Oliveira S., Costa I., Catarino S.O., Carvalho Ó. et al. Optimization of a photobiomodulation protocol to improve the cell viability, proliferation and protein expression in osteoblasts and periodontal ligament fibroblasts for accelerated orthodontic treatment. Biomedicines. 2024;12(1):180. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010180
15. Peruga M., Lis J. Correlation of sex hormone levels with orthodontic tooth movement in the maxilla: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Orthod. 2024;46(3):cjae025. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjae025
16. Alameeri Z.A., Jawad H.A. Comparative analysis of osteointegration in photostimulated dental implants: 650–976 nm diode lasers versus growth factors. J Med Life. 2024;17(8):769–775. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2023-0281
Review
For citations:
Alhumadi A. Gender-related response to different wavelength low-level laser therapy in orthodontic mandibular canine movement: a split mouth study. Endodontics Today. 2026;24(1):58-66. https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0159

























