Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of Hyflex EDM OGSF file system, Protaper Ultimate and RACE EVO file system: an in vitro study

INTRODUCTION. The intracanal fracture of nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments remains a significant procedural concern in endodontics. Advances in metallurgy, manufacturing processes, and geometric design have led to the development of new file systems with enhanced mechanical properties. The Hyflex EDM OGSF (HEDM), Protaper Ultimate (PTU), and RACE EVO (RE) systems represent distinct technological approaches to improving instrument safety. However, a direct comparative evaluation of their fracture resistance is limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 120 new NiTi files, 40 from each system (HEDM, PTU, RE), with a tip size of 25 and a .07 taper, were selected. For the cyclic fatigue test (n = 20 per group), instruments were rotated in a custom-fabricated stainless steel artificial canal with a 60° angle of curvature and a 5 mm radius until fracture. The number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was calculated. For the torsional resistance test (n = 20 per group), the apical 3 mm of each file was clamped, and the instrument was rotated clockwise at 2 RPM until fracture, following ISO 3630-1 standards. Maximum torque (Ncm) and angular deflection (degrees) at failure were recorded. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS. HEDM exhibited a significantly higher mean NCF (852.5 ± 75.3) compared to both RE (621.8 ± 60.2) and PTU (455.1 ± 55.4) (p < 0.001). RE also showed significantly higher cyclic fatigue resistance than PTU (p < 0.001). In the torsional test, PTU demonstrated the highest maximum torque to fracture (0.46 ± 0.05 Ncm), which was significantly greater than RE (0.41 ± 0.04 Ncm) and HEDM (0.34 ± 0.06 Ncm) (p < 0.001). The difference in torque resistance between RE and HEDM was also statistically significant (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS. Within the limitations of this laboratory study, the Hyflex EDM OGSF file system demonstrated the highest resistance to cyclic fatigue. The Protaper Ultimate file system exhibited the greatest resistance to torsional fracture. The choice of instrument should be guided by the specific anatomical challenges of the root canal system.

1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974;18(2):269–296.

2. Walia H.M., Brantley W.A., Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14(7):346–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(88)80196-1

3. Hülsmann M., Peters O.A., Dummer P.M.H. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):30–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x

4. Parashos P., Messer H.H. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod. 2006;32(11):1031–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.06.008

5. Sattapan B., Nervo G.J., Palamara J.E., Messer H.H. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000;26(3):161–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008

6. Pruett J.P., Clement D.J., Carnes D.L. Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997;23(2):77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80250-6

7. Peters O.A. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod. 2004;30(8):559–567. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000129039.59003.9d

8. Zupanc J., Vahdat-Pajouh N., Schäfer E. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys – a review. Int Endod J. 2018;51(10):1088–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12924

9. Shen Y., Zhou H.M., Zheng Y.F., Peng B., Haapasalo M. Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(2):163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.005

10. Gao Y., Gutmann J.L., Wilkinson K., Maxwell R., Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod. 2012;38(3):398–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.004

11. Ha J.H., Kim S.K., Cohenca N., Kim H.C. Effect of R-phase heat treatment on torsional resistance and cyclic fatigue fracture. J Endod. 2013;39(3):389–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.028

12. Pedullà E., Lo Savio F., Boninelli S., Plotino G., Grande N.M., La Rosa G., Rapisarda E. Torsional and cyclic fatigue resistance of a new nickel-titanium instrument manufactured by electrical discharge machining. J Endod. 2016;42(1):156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.004

13. Iacono F., Pirani C., Generali L., Bolelli G., Sassatelli P., Lusvarghi L. et al. Structural analysis of HyFlex EDM instruments. Int Endod J. 2017;50(3):303–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12620

14. van der Vyver P.J., Paleker F., Vorster M., de Wet F.A. Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, m-wire, and gold wire: a micro-computed tomographic comparative study of one shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold instruments in maxillary first molars. J Endod. 2019;45(1):62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.09.013

15. Özyürek T., Yılmaz K., Uslu G. The effects of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Gold nickel-titanium instruments. Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42(4):301–308. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.4.301

16. Alfawaz H., Alqedairi A., Alsharekh H., Almuzaini E., Alzahrani S., Jamleh A. Effects of sodium hypochlorite concentration and temperature on the cyclic fatigue resistance of heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2018;44(10):1563–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.009

17. Allahem Z., Bendahmash M., Almeaither R., Alfawaz H., Alqedairi A. Evaluation of cyclic fatigue behavior of RACE EVO rotary Files: In-vitro comparative study. Saudi Dent J. 2024;36(4):656–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.03.009

18. Plotino G., Grande N.M., Sorci E., Malagnino V.A., Somma F. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2006;39(9):716–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01142.x

19. Lopes H.P., Ferreira A.A., Elias C.N., Moreira E.J., de Oliveira J.C., Siqueira J.F. Jr. Influence of rotational speed on the cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2009;35(7):1013–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.003

20. Hieawy A., Haapasalo M., Zhou H., Wang Z.J., Shen Y. Phase transformation behavior and resistance to bending and cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal instruments. J Endod. 2015;41(7):1134–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.030