Importance of the associative estimation of increase caries intensities in depending of mineralization activities of oral liquid and nosology forms of the congenital cleft of maxillary complex

AIM. Conduct the associative estimation of the increase of caries intensities in depending of the level of mineralizing potential of the mixed saliva and nosology forms of the congenital unjoining of maxillary complex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Importance of mineralizing activities of oral liquid was studied with determination its intercoupling with expression of the increase tooth decay beside 98 children with congenita pathology of the upper lip and palate. In this connection were chosen 4 clinical groups in depending of mineralizing level activities of the mixed saliva and caries-resistance. 1^st group has formed 19 children with high level of mineralizing potential of the mixed saliva and absence of tooth caries. In the second group entered 26 children with average level of mineralizing potential of the mixed saliva and carious of molars and premolars of the jaws. 28 children with low level of mineralizing potential of the saliva and carious defeat not only chewing teeth, but also maxillary incisor has formed the third group. In 4^th group entered 25 children with very low level of mineralizing potential of the mixed saliva and carious defeat all function-oriented teeth segment.

RESULTS. Factors of the increase of intensities of the teeth caries amongst 6–7 years children with named by vice and with high level of mineralizing activities of oral liquid after 12 months from moment of the primary checkup have formed at the average 0.26 ± 0.02, amongst children of 8–9 years these factors in given period has formed at the average 0.40 ± 0.03, amongst 10–11 year’s children they have formed 0.34 ± 0.06, amongst children of 12–13 years they have formed 0.41 ± 0.07, but amongst children of 14–15 years they have formed 0.47 ± 0.04. As a whole for three-year period of the observation from 2022 to 2024 years factors of the increase of caries intensities beside children in given age groups corresponded to importance’s 0.59 ± 0.05, 0.73 ± 0.05, 067 ± 0.09, 0.74 ± 0.09 and 0.80 ± 0.05 accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS. Reliable dynamics of caries intensities temporary and permanent teeth beside children with congenital pathology of maxillary complex, probably, is connected with absence of the complex program of the preventive maintenance of main dentistry diseases. Maximum dynamics of caries intensities amongst examined persons is connected with disorders homeostatic balances of oral cavity because of anatomist-functional disorders beside children with congenital pathology maxilla-facial area.

1. Danilova M.A., Aleksandrova L.I., Sirina N.V. The analysis of individual results of early prosthodontic treatment of children with congenital clefts of the upper lip and palate. Dental Forum. 2017;(4):22–23. (In Russ.)

2. Rogozhina Yu.S., Blokhina S.I., Bimbas E.S. On the issue of surgical treatment of patients with congenital orofacial clefts combined with other organ and system comorbidities. Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Prophylaxis. 2023;23(3):281–294. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2023-658

3. Násser L.S., Martelli D.R.B., Swerts M.S.O., Popoff D.A.V., Barros L.M., Martelli H. Jr. Ophthalmic changes in cleft lip and palate. Rev Bras Ophthalmol. 2016;75(2):94–98. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7280.20160021

4. Altunhan H., Annagür A., Konak M., Ertuğrul S., Ors R., Koç H. The incidence of congenital anomalies associated with cleft palate/cleft lip and palate in neonates in the Konya region, Turkey. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(6):541–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.08.001

5. Pereira A.V., Fradinho N., Carmo S., de Sousa J.M., Rasteiro D., Duarte R., Leal M.J. Associated malformations in children with orofacial clefts in Portugal: A 31-year study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(2):e1635. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001635

6. Mamedov A.A., Maclennan A.B., Ryabkova M.G., DoninI.M., Volkov Y.O., Parfenov D.S. et al. Betweendisciplinary approach to treatment of children with cleft of the lip and palate at period of newborn. System Integration in Health Care. 2017;(2):52–59. (In Russ.) Available at: https://sys-int.ru/sites/default/files/sys-int-32-52-59.pdf (accessed: 12.03.2026).

7. Sanchez M.L.N., Benjamin R.H., Mitchell L.E., Langlois P.H., Canfield M.A., Swartz M.D. et al. Birth defect co-occurrence patterns among infants with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(4):417–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211010060

8. Azadgoli B., Munabi N.C.O., Fahradyan A., Auslander A., McCullough M., Aflatooni N. et al. Congenital heart disease in patients with cleft lip/palate and its impact on cleft management. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(8):957–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/105566562092491

9. Sato Y., Yoshioka E., Saijo Y., Kato Y., Nagaya K., Takahashi S. et al. Associated congenital anomalies and syndromes of 248 infants with orofacial clefts born between 2011 and 2014 in the Japan environment and children’s study. Congenit Anom. 2023;63(1):9–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/cga.12496

10. Nagalo K., Ouédraogo I., Laberge J.M., Caouette-Laberge L., Turgeon J. Congenital malformations and medical conditions associated with orofacial clefts in children in Burkina Faso. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0833-9

11. Korolenkova M.V., Starikova N.V., Ageeva L.V. Risk factors for teeth aplasia and hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate children. Stomatology. 2016;95(1):59–62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201695159-62

12. Mardanov A.E., Smirnov I.E., Mamedov A.A. Congenital cleft of the lip and palate in children: pathogenetical significance of matrix metalloproteinases. Russian Pediatric Journal. 2016;19(2):106–113. (In Russ.)

13. Peat J.H. Effects of presurgical oral orthopedics on bilateral complete clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1982;19(2):100–103.

14. Bogoroditskaya A.V., Sarafanova M.E., Radcig E.Yu., Prityko A.G. Clinical management of children with congenital cleft lip and palate: an interdisciplinary problem. Pediatriya – Zhurnal im G.N. Speranskogo. 2015;94(3):78–81. (In Russ.) Available at: https://pediatriajournal.ru/files/upload/mags/346/2015_3_4298.pdf (accessed: 12.03.2026).

15. Freitas J.A., Garib D.G., Trindade-Suedam I.K., Carvalho R.M., Oliveira T.M., Lauris Rde C. et al. Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies-USP (HRAC-USP) – part 3: oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(6):673–679. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000600014

16. Greenhalgh K.L., Aligianis I.A., Bromilow G., Cox H., Hill C., Stait Y. et al. 22q11 deletion: a multisystem disorder requiring multidisciplinary input. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(6):523–524. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.88.6.523