Minimally invasive dental implantation in patients with chronic kidney disease
https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0239
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the results of dental implantation in patients with chronic kidney disease of various stages using a minimally invasive protocol (flapless) compared with traditional surgical approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The prospective clinical study included 56 patients (mean age 65 ± 7.5 years) with complete maxillary or mandibular edentulism and various stages of chronic kidney disease. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 28) – implant placement without mucoperiosteal flap reflection, group 2 (n = 28) – traditional crestal access. Oral hygiene index, early wound healing score (EHS), quality of life using OHIP-14 questionnaire, implant stability (ISQ) at surgery, at 3, 6 and 12 months, as well as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and CKD stage were evaluated.
RESULTS. No significant differences in hygiene index were found between groups at all observation periods (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the EHS index on days 0, 3, 7 and 10 between the groups (p > 0.05). Quality of life (OHIP-14) was significantly better in group 1 at 3 months (p < 0.001), 6 months (p < 0.001) and 4 years (p = 0.038). ISQ in the minimally invasive access group was higher at all stages. An inverse correlation was found between ISQ at 12 months and GFR (ρ = –0.38, p = 0.047), as well as a direct correlation between ISQ at surgery and EHS at day 10 (ρ = 0.40, p = 0.037).
CONCLUSION. Minimally invasive dental implantation protocol in patients with CKD stages 1–2 is associated with comparable early wound healing according to the EHS, with no statistically significant differences between groups, as well as higher quality of life and higher implant stability compared with the traditional approach. Decreased renal function may negatively affect implant stability in the long-term period.
About the Authors
M. V. SofronovRussian Federation
Matvey V. Sofronov – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Dentistry, Head of the Department of Dentistry
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
S. I. Bulanov
Russian Federation
Sergey I. Bulanov – Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Rector
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
D. N. Lysov
Russian Federation
Dmitry N. Lysov – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Postgraduate Dentistry
Samara
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
1. Alla I., Lorusso F., Gehrke S.A., Inchingolo F., Di Carmine M., Scarano A. Implant survival in patients with chronic kidney disease: A case report and systematic review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(3):2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032401
2. Scarano A., Mortellaro C., Alla I., Lorusso F., Gehrke S.A., Inchingolo F., Lucchina A.G., Tari S.R. Oral surgery and dental implants in patients with chronic kidney disease: Scoping review for oral health status. Discov Med. 2024;36(184):874–881. https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202436184.82
3. Stevens P.E., Ahmed S.B., Carrero J.J., Foster B., Francis A., Hall R.K. et al. KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2024;105(4S):S117–S314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018
4. Ramalho J., Marques I.D.B., Hans D., Dempster D., Zhou H., Patel P. et al. The trabecular bone score: Relationships with trabecular and cortical microarchitecture measured by HR-pQCT and histomorphometry in patients with chronic kidney disease. Bone. 2018;116:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.08.006
5. Salomão G.V.D.S., Sendyk D.I., Ortega K.L., Costa A.L.F., Di Profio B., Braz-Silva P.H., Pannuti C.M. Dental implants in patients with end-stage renal disease: A case series. Spec Care Dentist. 2025;45(2):e70014. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.70014
6. Marini L., Rojas M.A., Sahrmann P., Aghazada R., Pilloni A. Early Wound Healing Score: a system to evaluate the early healing of periodontal soft tissue wounds. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018;48(5):274–283. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2018.48.5.274
7. Slade G.D., Spencer A.J. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994;11(1):3–11.
8. Sennerby L., Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47(1):51–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
9. Romero-Serrano M., Romero-Ruiz M.M., Herrero-Climent M., Rios-Carrasco B., Gil-Mur J. Correlation between implant surface roughness and implant stability: A systematic review. Dent J. 2024;12(9):276. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12090276
10. Ramanauskaite A., Juodzbalys G. Diagnostic principles of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and guidelines for peri-implantitis diagnosis proposal. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016;7(3):e8. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2016.7308
11. Tomasi C., Tessarolo F., Caola I., Piccoli F., Wennström J.L., Nollo G., Berglundh T. Early healing of peri-implant mucosa in man. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(10):816–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12591
12. Liu W., Zhang S., Zhao D., Zou H., Sun N., Liang X. et al. Vitamin D supplementation enhances the fixation of titanium implants in chronic kidney disease mice. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e95689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095689 (Erratum in: PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e99972).
13. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Update Work Group. KDIGO 2017 clinical practice guideline update for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl. 2017;7(1):1–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kisu.2017.04.001 (Erratum in: Kidney Int Suppl. 2017;7(3):e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kisu.2017.10.001)
14. Zou H., Zhao X., Sun N., Zhang S., Sato T., Yu H. et al. Effect of chronic kidney disease on the healing of titanium implants. Bone. 2013;56(2):410–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.014
15. Wang F., Huang W., Zhang Z., Wang H., Monje A., Wu Y. Minimally invasive flapless vs. flapped approach for single implant placement: a 2-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(6):757–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12875
16. Daubert D.M., Weinstein B.F., Bordin S., Leroux B.G., Flemming T.F. Prevalence and predictive factors for periimplant disease and implant failure: a cross-sectional analysis. J Periodontol. 2015;86(3):337–347. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140438
17. Becker W., Goldstein M., Becker B.E., Sennerby L.. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(S1):S21–S7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00071.x
18. Ostrovskaya L.Yu., Zakharova N.В., Lysov A.V., Kochkonyan Т.S., Domenyuk D.A. Optimization of the dental implantation protocol in patients with partial secondary edentulousness and vitamin D deficiency. Medical Alphabet. 2021;(24):22–26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-24-22-26
19. Muzykin M.I., Iordanishvili A.K., Losev F.F., Grigoriev S.G. Reparative potential of bone tissue and associated influencing factors. Stomatology. 2024;103(2):41–49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202410302141
Review
For citations:
Sofronov M.V., Bulanov S.I., Lysov D.N. Minimally invasive dental implantation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Endodontics Today. https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0239

























