Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment
https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-2981-2019-17-1-46-49
Abstract
Relevance. The forecast of the functionality of the tooth after endodontic treatment, when resistance to mechanical loads is significantly reduced, depends on the choice of method and material for the restoration.
Aim. The aim of the work was to compare the physicomechanical and clinical qualities of composite materials used to restore posterior teeth after endodontic treatment.
Materials and methods. Studies were carried out according to GOST 31574-2012 – determination of the curing depth, strength with diametral rupture, bending and determination of water absorption and water solubility, as well as the integrity of the restorations, the presence of chips, the development of secondary caries after 24 months.
Result of research. Based on a comparison of the physicomechanical and clinical qualities of the composite materials Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar Vivadent) and SDR (Dentsply) used to restore the posterior teeth after endodontic treatment, as well as the timing of the time spent on treatment, the choice of a composite material for the restoration is justified.
Conclusions. Indicators for all the parameters studied composite materials Tetric EvoCeram and SDR more perfect than required by GOST. The time spent on the restoration of the posterior teeth using a two-layer technique using the composite SDR as the basis and restoring the occlusal surface with the Tetric EvoCeram composite is significantly on average 10 minutes less than with a tooth restoration using the multilayer Tetric EvoCeram composite material ( p ≤ 0.05).
About the Authors
A. V. Mitronin
Department of cariesology and endodontics, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A. I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, Professor, Head of Department.
D. Yu. Fadeeva
Limited Liability Company «Nava»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
dentist therapist, Head of 2nd medical and surgical Department.
T. V. Grineva
Limited Liability Company «StomaDent»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Quality and Development Director.
V. N. Chilikin
State Autonomous Healthcare Institution of the City of Moscow
«Dental polyclinic №9 Of the Department of Health of the City of Moscow»
Russian Federation
MD, Associate Professor, consultant doctor.
Russian Federation
MD, Associate Professor, consultant doctor.
References
1. Макеева, И. М. Восстановление зубов светоотверждаемы¬ми композитными материалами / И. М. Макеева, А. И. Николаев // М.: Медпресс-информ. – 2011. – 364 с. [Makeeva, I. M. Restoration of teeth with light-curing composite materials / I. M. Makeeva, A. I. Nikolaev // M.: Medpress-inform. – 2011. – 364 p.]
2. Николаев, А. И. Практическая терапевтическая стоматология / А. И. Николаев, Л. М. Цепов // М: МЕДпресс-информ. – 2003. – 547 с. [Nikolaev, A. I. Practical therapeutic dentistry / A. I. Nikolaev, L. M. Tsepov // M: MEDpress-inform. – 2003. – 547 p.]
3. Фадеева, Д. Ю Зависимость прочности реставрации из композитного материала от времени и способа полимеризации при восстановлении полостей II класса / Д. Ю. Фадеева, В. Н. Чи¬ликин, Т. В. Гринева // Эндодонтия today. – 2015. – № 2. – С. 6–8. [Fadeeva, D. YU The dependence of the strength of the restoration of the composite material on the time and method of polymerization in the restoration of cavities of class II / D. YU. Fadeeva, V. N. Chilikin, T. V. Grineva // Ehndodontiya today. – 2015. – № 2. – P. 6–8.]
4. Макеева, И. М. Биомеханика зубов и пломбировочных мате¬риалов / И. М. Макеева, В. А. Загорский // М.: Издательство БИ¬НОМ. – 2013. – 264 с. [Makeeva, I. M. Biomechanics of teeth and filling materials / I. M. Makeeva, V. A. Zagorskiy // M.: Publishing BINOM. – 2013. – 264 p.]
Review
For citations:
Mitronin A.V., Fadeeva D.Yu., Grineva T.V., Chilikin V.N. Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment. Endodontics Today. 2019;17(1):46-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-2981-2019-17-1-46-49
Email this article 