Apical microsurgery vs repeated orthograde treatment of root canals: criteria for selection of a method of treatment. Part II
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-3-37-42
Abstract
Relevance. In case of failure of primary therapy of root canals the modern endodontiya gives to doctors various opportunities of treatment allowing to avoid a tooth extraction. In article the reasons of failure of standard endodontic treatment are considered.
Aim. Recommendations and diagnostic criteria for the choice of a technique of repeated intervention are discussed: orthograde therapy, apical surgical treatment, a tooth extraction or dynamic observation of a clinical situation. The clinical cases in article illustrate process of making decision on the choice of tactics of treatment in various clinical situations.
About the Authors
M. V. Berkhman
Department of stomatology of the general practice of SPBINSTOM; «MEDI on Commandant's»
Russian Federation
PhD, the dentist of clinic, the assistant to department
Russian Federation
PhD, the dentist of clinic, the assistant to department
S. S. Kozlov
«MEDI on Commandant's»
Russian Federation
the dentist
Russian Federation
the dentist
A. I. Prosin
«MEDI on Commandant's»
Russian Federation
the dentist
Russian Federation
the dentist
O. V. Chernenko
«MEDI on Commandant's»
Russian Federation
the dentist
Russian Federation
the dentist
References
1. Берхман М. В., Козлова С. С., Просин А. И., Черненко О. В. Апикальная микрохирургия vs повторное ортоградное лечение корневых каналов: критерии выбора метода лечения. Часть I // Эндодонтия Today. 2019. №2. С. 59-65. Berhman M. V., Kozlova S. S., Prosin A. I., Chernenko O. V. Apical microsurgery vs re-orthographic treatment of root canals: criteria for choosing a method of treatment. Part I // Endodontia Today. 2019. №2. P. 59-65.
2. Румянцев В. А., Некрасов А. В., Моисеев Д. А., Задорожный Д. В., Панкин П. И. Биопленка в эндодонтии. Часть II. Методы борьбы с биопленкой при эндодонтическом лечении зубов (обзор литерату- ры) // Эндодонтия Today. 2018. №2. С. 46-50. Rumyantsev V. A., Necrasov A. V., Moses D. A., Zadrozhny D. V., Pankin P. I. Biofilka in endodontia. Part II. Biofilm Control Techniques in Endodontic Dental Treatment (Literature Review) // Endodontia Today. 2018. №2. P. 46-50.
3. Румянцев В. А., Родионова Е. Г., Некрасов А. В., Черджиева Ф. Б., Куприянова М. С. Биопленка в эндодонтии. Часть I. Свойства и методы и изучения (обзор л итературы) // Эндодонтия Today. 2 018. №1. С. 24-28. Rumyantsev V. A., Rodionova E. G., Necrasov A. V., Cherjieva F. B., Kupriyanova M. S. Biofilka in endodontia. Part I. Properties and Methods of Study (Literature Review) // Endodontia Today. 2018. №1. P. 24-28.
4. Bhaskar S. N. Nonsurgical resolution of radicular cysts // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972. Vol. 34. P. 458-468.
5. Bhaskar S. N. Oral surgery-oral pathology conference No.17, Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Periapical lesions-types, incidence, and clinical features // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966. Vol. 21. P. 657-671.
6. Frank A. L., Click D. H., Patterson S. S., Weine F. S. Long term evaluation of surgically placed amalgam fillings // J. Endod. 1992. Vol. 18. P. 391-398.
7. Fristad I., Molven O., Halse A. Nonsurgical retreated root filled teeth – radiographic findings after 20-27 years // Int Endod J. 2004. Vol. 37 (1). P. 8-12.
8. Filippi A, Meier M. L., Lambrecht J. T. Periradicular surgery with endoscopy – a clinical prospective study // Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2006. №116. Р. 12-17.
9. Gutmann J. L., Harrison J. W. Surgical Endodontics, 1st ed. – Boston, MA, USA: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991. – 326-31. 338-57.
10. Jesslen P., Zetterqvist L., Heimdahl A. Long-term results of amalgam versus glass ionomer cement as apical sealant after apicectomy // Oral Surg. 1995. №79. Р. 101-103.
11. Kvist Т., Reit C. Results of endodontic retreatment: a randomized clinical study comparing surgical and nonsurgical procedures // J. Endod. 1999. Vol. 25. P. 814-817.
12. Maddalone M., Gagliani M. Periapical endodontic surgery: a 3-year follow-upstudy // Int Endod J. 2003. №36. Р. 193-198.
13. Orstavik D. Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man // Int. Endod. J. 1996. Vol. 29. P. 150-155.
14. Rud J., Andreasen J. O., Jensen J. E. A follow-up study of 1000 cases treated by endodontic surgery // Int J Oral Surg. 1972. №1. Р. 215-228.
15. Taschieri S., Del Fabbro M., Testori T., Francetti L., Weinstein R. Endodontic surgery with ultrasonic retrotips: one-year follow-up // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005. №100. Р. 380-387.
16. Taschieri S., Del Fabbro M., Testori T., Francetti L., Weinstein R. Endodontic surgery using 2 different magnification devices: preliminary results of a randomized controlled study // J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006. №64. Р. 235-242.
17. Arx von T., Gerber C., Hardt N. Periradicular surgery of molars: a prospective clinical study with a one-year follow-up // Int Endod J. 2001. №34. Р. 520-525.
18. Zuolo M. L., Ferreira M. O., Gutmann J. L. Prognosis in periradicular surgery: a clinical prospective study // Int Endod J. 2000. №33. Р. 91-98.
Review
For citations:
Berkhman M.V., Kozlov S.S., Prosin A.I., Chernenko O.V. Apical microsurgery vs repeated orthograde treatment of root canals: criteria for selection of a method of treatment. Part II. Endodontics Today. 2019;17(3):37-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-3-37-42
Email this article 