Comparative characteristics of the effectiveness of methods of distalization of molars at the stages of orthodontic treatment
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-4-50-53
Abstract
Today, there are a large number of different in function, both removable and non-removable devices used to treat distal occlusion. The article presents data on a comparative characteristic of the effectiveness of various methods of distalizing molars based on an analysis of modern literature.
About the Authors
Z. S. Khabadze
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Ph.D., associate professor
Russian Federation
Ph.D., associate professor
S. M. Abdulkerimova
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. D. Dzhabrailova
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yu A. Bakaev
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Kulikova
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. R. Panfilova
Private dental practice, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. R. Nurtdinov
Private dental practice, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Angle Orthod. 2019 Jun 24. doi: 10.2319/121418-872.1. [Epub ahead of print]. Treatment effects of the Carriere® Motion 3D™ appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion in adolescents. Kim-Berman H, McNamara JA Jr, Lints JP, McMullen C, Franchi L.
2. Bussik T.J., McNamara J.A.Jr. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated shhith the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:333–343.
3. Creekmore T.D., Eklund M.K. 1983. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod. Apr., 17 (4):266-9.
4. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Sep;14(3):219-24. Adolescent patients' experience with the Carriere distalizer appliance. Hamilton CF1, Saltaji H, Preston CB, Flores-Mir C, Tabbaa S.
5. Farret M.M., Benitez Farret M.M. 2013. Skeletal class III malocclusion treated using a non-surgical approach supplemented with mini-implants: A case report. J Orthod, 40 (3^256-63.
6. Rodrhguez Hector Luis (2013) Лечение взрослого пациента с патологией прикуса class II, осложнённого открытым. Случай без удаления // Журнал «Современная ортодонтия», 2013. – № 3. – С. 8-11
7. Rodrhguez Hector Luis (2013) Treatment of an adult patient with class II occlusion pathology complicated by open. The case without deletion // Journal of Modern Orthodontics, 2013. – No. 3. – P. 8-11
8. Fuziy A. Sagittal, vertical and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the Pendulum appliance //Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. -2006. – Vol.130. – No4. – P.502-510.
9. Ghosh J. и Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization //Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. – 1996. – Vol.110. – P.639 – 646.
10. Gurgel Jde. A. Pinzan-Vercelino C.R., Bramante F.S., Rivera A.P. 2013. Distalization of maxillary molars using a lever arm and miniimplant. Orthodontics (Chic.)., 14 (1):140-9.
11. Higuchi K.W., Slack J.M. 1991. The use of titanium fixtures for intraoral anchorage to facilitate orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 6:338-344.
12. Hilgers J.J. The pendulum appliance for Class II noncompliance. J Clin Orthod., 1992;26:706–714.
13. Н.В. Мягкова, Н.Л. Рамм, Е.А. Аксенова (2009) Ортодонтическое лечение мезиальной окклюзии // Научный журнал «Проблемы стоматологии», 2009 N.V. Myagkova, N.L. Ramm, E.A. Aksenova (2009) Orthodontic treatment of mesial occlusion // Scientific journal "Problems of Dentistry", 2009
14. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):ZR01-ZR04. doi: 10.7860/ JCDR/2017/25656.9922. Epub 2017 May 1. Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series. Singh DP1, Arora S2, Yadav SK3, Kedia NB4.
Review
For citations:
Khabadze Z.S., Abdulkerimova S.M., Dzhabrailova G.D., Bakaev Yu.A., Kulikova A.A., Panfilova E.R., Nurtdinov I.R. Comparative characteristics of the effectiveness of methods of distalization of molars at the stages of orthodontic treatment. Endodontics Today. 2019;17(4):50-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-4-50-53
