Preview

Endodontics Today

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of maxillary expansion techniques using orthodontic appliances

https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-4-58-62

Abstract

Palatal dilation techniques were developed as a method of applying significant force to the upper jaw in a horizontal plane to rupture the median palatal suture. To achieve this goal, various designs of devices have been developed over the years. The subject of the study of many authors were changes in the bone and dental system, as well as the duration of treatment results obtained due to the use of functional devices with different rates of action. The rate of expansion depends on the level of applied forces and the mode of activation of the device. There are 3 rates of expansion of the upper jaw: slow, semi-rapid and rapid. An alternative to rapid palatal expansion with the activation of the screw 1-2 times a day is a slow expansion with the activation of the screw 1 every 2 days or using of another type of apparatus, where the source of activation is the spring. The study, which compared the device with a spring and the device for rapid palatal expansion of adolescents, showed that they have a similar effect. The available data indicate that histological examination of sutures after palatal dilation confirmed the presence of pronounced activity of both apposition and resorption [25,26]. Devices for rapid palatal expansion (RPE/RME-rapid palatal/maxillary expansion), as well as semi-rapid and slow expansion are traditionally used as a method of correction of cross bite. In addition, they are used to increase the perimeter of the dentition of the upper jaw, normalize the level of the Wilson curve, "expand the smile" and to increase the patency of the respiratory tract. Maxillofacial anatomy is a critical factor influencing the pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea. In combination with decreased oral volume, transverse maxillary deficiency is known to be a key contributor to obstructive sleep apnoe. After GNE, there is an increase in the volume of the nasal cavity and a decrease in the resistance of the nasal airflow. RME also allows the tongue to protrude forward and upward, expanding the space of the posterior pharyngeal airway during sleep [31, 32]. With regard to the pathology of the bite, the cross bite is much more common because of the narrow upper jaw than because of the insufficient width of the lower jaw. The most popular way to treat this pathology is rapid expansion of the jaw (RME).

About the Authors

L. A. Kozhevnikova
Кафедра Терапевтической стоматологии; Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН), Медицинский институт
Russian Federation
Ph.D.


G D. Dzhabrailova
Кафедра Терапевтической стоматологии; Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН), Медицинский институт
Russian Federation


S. M. Abdulkerimova
Кафедра Терапевтической стоматологии; Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН), Медицинский институт
Russian Federation


K. N. Kerimova
Кафедра Терапевтической стоматологии; Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН), Медицинский институт
Russian Federation


O. V. Pilshchikova
Кафедра Терапевтической стоматологии; Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН), Медицинский институт
Russian Federation
Ph.D.


V. M. Slonova
Кафедра Терапевтической стоматологии; Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН), Медицинский институт
Russian Federation
Ph.D.


A. А. Gevorkyan
Кафедра Терапевтической стоматологии; Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Российский университет дружбы народов (РУДН), Медицинский институт
Russian Federation
Ph.D.


References

1. Schiffman, P. H., & Tuncay, O. C. (2001). Maxillary expansion: a meta analysis. Clinical Orthodontics and Research, 4(2), 86–96.

2. Eirew HL., Rapid maxillary expansion. Dent Update (1976), 251261

3. McNamara JA., Early intervention in the transverse dimension: is it worth the effort? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121-572

4. Lagravere MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Long-term dental arch changes after rapid maxillary expansion treatment: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:155–61.

5. Martina R, Cioffi I, Farella M, Leone P, Manzo P, Matarese G. Transverse changes determined by rapid and slow maxillary expansion - a low-dose CT-based randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2012;15:159–68.

6. Lima Filho RM, Ruellas AC. Long-term anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal class II patients treated with slow and rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:870–4.

7. Huynh T, Kennedy DB, Joondeph DR, Bollen AM. Treatment response and stability of slow maxillary expansion using Haas, hyrax, and quad-helix appliances: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:331–9.

8. Weissheimer A, de Menezes LM, Mezomo M, Dias DM, de Lima EM, Rizzatto SM. Immediate effects of rapid maxillary expansion with Haas-type and hyrax-type expanders: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:366–76

9. R.A. BellA review of maxillary expansion in relation to rate of expansion and patient's age. Am J Orthod, 81 (1982), pp. 32-37

10. R.J. HenrySlow, maxillary expansion: a review of quad-helix therapy during the transitional dentition. ASDC J Dent Child, 60 (1993), pp. 408-413

11. A.J. HaasLong-term posttreatment evaluation of rapid palatal expansion. Angle Orthod, 50 (1980), pp. 189-217

12. S. Akkaya, S. Lorenzon, T.T. UcemComparison of dental arch and arch perimeter changes between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod, 20 (1998), pp. 255-261

13. P.H. Schiffman, O.C. TuncayMaxillary expansion: a meta analysis. Clin Orthod Res, 4 (2001), pp. 86-96

14. S. Linder-Aronson, J. LindgrenThe skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion. Br J Orthod, 6 (1979), pp. 25-29

15. L.M. Spillane, J.A. McNamara Jr.Maxillary adaptation to expansion in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod, 1 (1995), pp. 176-187

16. W. ProfittContemporary orthodontics Mosby, St Louis (2000).

17. E.P. HicksSlow maxillary expansion. A clinical study of the skeletal versus dental response to low-magnitude force. Am J Orthod, 73 (1978), pp. 121-141 18. T. K. Shkavro, I.A. Pavlova, Z.V. Malanova. Apparaty dlya bystrogo nebnogo rasshireniya i distalizatsii molyarov [Devices for fast sky expansion and distalization of molyarov] Irkutsk, 2017

18. Cross D.L., MacDonald J.P. The effect of rapid expansion of the upper jaw on the skeleton, tooth and nasal structures: posterioranterior cephalometric examination. Eur J Orthod 22 (2000), 519-528

19. J.E. Harrison, D. AshbyOrthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2001)

20. Bjerklin, K. Follow-up controls of patients with unilateral posterior cross-bite treated with expansion plates or the quad-helix appliance. J Orofac Orthop 2000. 61:112–124.

21. Huynh, T., Kennedy, D. B., Joondeph, D. R., & Bollen, A.-M. (2009). Treatment response and stability of slow maxillary expansion using Haas, hyrax, and quad-helix appliances: A retrospective study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 136(3), 331–339.

22. Sandikçiolu, M., & Hazar, S. (1997). Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 111(3), 321–327.

23. Yu, J. C., Fearon, J., Havlik, R. J., Buchman, S. R., & Polley, J. W. (2004). Distraction Osteogenesis of the Craniofacial Skeleton. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 114(1), 1e–20e.

24. Swennen, G., Schliephake, H., Dempf, R., Schierle, H., & Malevez, C. (2001). Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part 1: clinical studies. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 30(2), 89–103.

25. Günbay, T., Akay, M. C., Günbay, S., Aras, A., Koyuncu, B. Ö., & Sezer, B. (2008). Transpalatal Distraction Using Bone-Borne Distractor: Clinical Observations and Dental and Skeletal Changes. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 66(12), 2503–2514.

26. Yoon, A., Guilleminault, C., Zaghi, S., & Yung-Chuan Liu, S. (2019). Distraction Osteogenesis Maxillary Expansion (DOME) for Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients with Narrow Maxilla and Nasal Floor. Sleep Medicine.

27. Kim KB, Adams D, Araújo EA, Behrents RG. Evaluation of immediate soft tissue changes after rapid maxillary expansion. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17(5):157–164.

28. Kilic N, Kiki A, Oktay H, Erdem A. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on Holdaway soft tissue measurements. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(3):239–243.


Review

For citations:


Kozhevnikova L.A., Dzhabrailova G.D., Abdulkerimova S.M., Kerimova K.N., Pilshchikova O.V., Slonova V.M., Gevorkyan A.А. Comparative analysis of maxillary expansion techniques using orthodontic appliances. Endodontics Today. 2019;17(4):58-62. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-4-58-62



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-2981 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7242 (Online)