Preview

Endodontics Today

Advanced search

The choice of tactics of treatment of patients at the endo periodontal defeats with primary defeat of the parodont and secondary involvement of the endodont

https://doi.org/10.25636 / PMP.2.2018.3.2

Abstract

Relevance of a problem of the combined defeats of the parodont and endodont it is caused by high prevalence of pathology and lack of uniform approaches to complex treatment of this category of patients that has defined a research objective: optimization of methods of treatment the endoparodontalnykh of defeats taking into account pathogenesis of a disease. The research was conducted in 2 groups — main (n = 12) and comparisons (n = 13) which were made by patients with primary defeat of the parodont and secondary involvement in process of the endodont at which examination with use of a computer conical and beam tomography and the automated measuring system «Florida Probe» is conducted, and treatment included basic therapy of pathology of the parodont, endodontichesky treatment and the supporting therapy of the parodont. In the main group the basic and supporting therapy of pathology of the parodont included processing the parodontalnykh of pockets the VectortmParo system. The received results in the form of disappearance of bleeding, mobility of teeth, reduction of depth of a parodontalny pocket to values of ≤3,5 mm and restoration of structure of a bone tissue up to 1/3 lengths of a root with preservation of these indicators on the remote terms of observation in the main group in comparison with indicators of group of comparison «vector therapy» in treatment of patients with endoparodontalny defeats demonstrates efficiency of inclusion.

About the Authors

S. L. Blashkova
ФГБОУ ВО «Казанский ГМУ» Минздрава РФ.
Russian Federation


Yu. V. Fazylova
ФГБОУ ВО «Казанский ГМУ» Минздрава РФ.
Russian Federation


L. V. Alferov
ФГБОУ ВО «Казанский ГМУ» Минздрава РФ.
Russian Federation


D. Sh. Khasanov
ООО «Стоматологическая поликлиника № 9 г. Казани».
Russian Federation


References

1. Galeeva Z. R. Morfofunkcional’nye i ehtiopatogeneticheskie svyazi pri patologii ehndodonta i parodonta // Endodontiya today. 2012. № 2. S. 3-7.

2. Galeeva Z. R., Muhamedzhanova L. R. Znachenie plotnosti dentinnyh kanal’cev v patomorfogeneze ehndoparodontal’nyh porazhenij // Endodontiya today. 2012. № 3. S. 28-32.

3. Galieva D. T., Atrushkevich V. G., Carev V. N., Mitronin A. V. Endodontoparodontal’nye porazheniya: aktual’nye voprosy // Lechenie i profilaktika. 2015. № 4. S. 85-91.

4. Elovikova T. M., Barinova I. A. Prognosticheskie aspekty parodontita: endo-parodontal’nye porazheniya // Problemy stomatologii. 2012. № 5. S. 4-7.

5. Leonova E. V., Tumanova S. A., Kibrocashvili I. A., Pastuhova A. S. Differencial’naya diagnostika ehndo-parodontal’nyh porazhenij, opredelyayushchaya ob'em lechebnyh meropriyatij // Institut Stomatologii. 2015. № 68. S. 59-61.

6. Mazur I. P., Povoroznyuk B. B. Nekotorye aspekty patogeneza rezorbcii al’veolyarnogo grebnya pri generalizovannom parodontite // Parodontologiya. 1999. № 3 (13). S. 19-23.

7. Moroz P. V. Endo-parodontal’nyj sindrom: anatomicheskie predposylki razvitiya, ehtiologiya, klassifikaciya i taktika lecheniya // Institut stomatologii. 2014. № 1. S. 91-94.

8. Orekhova L. Yu., Kudryavceva T. V., Osipova V. A., Barmasheva A. A. Vliyanie sochetannyh porazhenij oslozhnennogo kariesa i vospalitel’nyh zabolevanij parodonta na sostoyanie zubochelyustnoj sistemy // Parodontologiya. 2004. № 2 (31). S. 8-42.

9. Orekhova L. Yu., Loboda E. S., Shcherbakova D. S. Antibakterial’nyj i protivovospalitel’nyj ehffekty parodontal’noj terapii s pomoshch’yu apparata Vector // Parodontologiya. 2011. № 3. S. 31-37.

10. Silin A. V., Abramova N. E., Leonova E. V., Tumanova S. A. dr. Diagnostika i planirovanie lecheniya ehndoparodontal’nyh porazhenij // Parodontologiya. 2015. № 3 (76). S. 74-80.

11. Cimbalistov A. V., Surdina E. D., Shtorina G. B., Avdeenko Yu. L. i dr. Sostoyanie pul’py intaktnyh zubov pri generalizovannom parodontite (tezisy) // Parodontologiya. 2007. № 4 (45). S. 26-27.

12. Shaposhnikova A. A., Haritonova M. P., Grigor’ev S. S. Differencirovannyj podhod k diagnostike i lecheniyu ehndo-parodontal’nyh porazhenij // Zdorov’e i obrazovanie v XXI veke. 2007. T. 9. № 4. S. 386-387.

13. Yanushevich O. O., Ajvazova R. A., Sokolova E. Yu. Fotoaktiviruemaya dezinfekciya kak al’ternativna tradicionnym metodom antisepticheskogo vozdejstviya v ehndodontii, parodontologii i gastroehnterologii // Endodontiya today. 2014. № 3. S. 3-6.

14. Belk C. E., Gutmann J. L. Perspectives, controversies and directives on pulpal-periodontal relationship // J. Canadian Dent. Assoc. 1990. Vol. 56. P. 1013-1017.

15. Harrington G. W., Steiner D. R. Periodontal-endodontic considerations // In: Walton R. E., Torabinejad M. Principles and practice of endodontics, 3rd edn. — Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co., 2002. — P. 466-484.

16. Simon J. H. S., Glick D. H., Frank A. L. The relationship of endodontic-periodontal lesions // J. Endod. 1972. Vol. 43. P. 202-208.


Review

For citations:


Blashkova S.L., Fazylova Yu.V., Alferov L.V., Khasanov D.Sh. The choice of tactics of treatment of patients at the endo periodontal defeats with primary defeat of the parodont and secondary involvement of the endodont. Endodontics Today. 2018;16(3):8-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25636 / PMP.2.2018.3.2



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-2981 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7242 (Online)