Design features of the rotary endodontic instruments system ProFile
Abstract
About the Authors
Т. БеляеваRussian Federation
Е. Ржанов
Russian Federation
References
1. Wan J., Rasimick B. J., Musikant B. L., Deutsch A. S. A comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance in reciprocating and rotary nickel-titanium instruments // Aust Endod J. 2011. №37 (3). Р. 122-127.
2. Lee M. H., Versluis A., Kim B. M., Lee C. J., Hur B., Kim H. C. Correlation between experimental cyclic fatigue resistance and numerical stress analysis for nickel-titanium rotary files // J Endod. 2011. №37 (8). Р. 1152-1157.
3. Shen Y., Qian W., Abtin H., Gao Y., Haapasalo M. J. Fatigue testing of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments // J Endod. 2011. №37 (7). Р. 997-1001.
4. Huang H. M., Chang W. J., Teng N. C., Lin H. L., Hsieh S. C. Structural analysis of cyclicloaded nickel-titanium rotary instruments by using resonance frequency as a parameter // J Endod. 2011. №37 (7). Р. 993-996.
5. Adorno C. G., Yoshioka T., Suda H. Crack initiation on the apical root surface caused by three different nickel-titanium rotary files at different working lengths // J Endod. 2011. №37 (4). Р. 522-525.
6. Yum J., Cheung G. S., Park J. K., Hur B., Kim H. C. Torsional strength and toughness of nickel-titanium rotary files // J Endod. 2011. №37 (3). Р. 382-386.
7. Setzer F. C., Kwon T. K., Karabucak B. Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences // J Endod. 2010. №36 (7). Р. 1226-1229.
8. Al-Omari M. A., Aurich T., Wirtti S. Shaping canals with ProFiles and K3 instruments: does operator experience matter? // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010. №110 (3). Р. 50-55.
9. Ersev H., Yilmaz B., Ciftçioğlu E., Ozkarsli S. F. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010. №109 (5). Р. 86-93.
10. Stewart J. T., Lafkowitz S., Appelbaum K., Hartwell G. Distortion and breakage of Liberator, EndoSequence, and ProFile systems in severely curved roots of molars // J Endod. 2010. №36 (4). Р. 729-731.
11. Oh S. R., Chang S. W., Lee Y., Gu Y., Son W. J., Lee W., Baek S. H., Bae K. S., Choi G. W., Lim S. M., Kum K. Y. A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: ability to resist cyclic fatigue // Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010. №109 (4). Р. 622-628.
12. Plotino G., Grande N. M., Melo M. C., Bahia M. G., Testarelli L., Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments in a simulated apical abrupt curvature // Int Endod J. 2010. №43 (3). Р. 226-230.
13. Vahid A., Roohi N., Zayeri F. A comparative study of four rotary NiTi instruments in preserving canal curvature, preparation time and change of working length // Aust Endod J. 2009. №35 (2). Р. 93-97.
14. Chow D. Y., Stover S. E., Bahcall J. K., Jaunberzins A., Toth J. M. In vitro comparison of the rake angles between K3 and ProFile endodontic file systems // J Endod. 2005. №31 (3). Р. 180-182.
15. Sonntag D. Schneidengeometrie und Effizienz voll-rotierender Nickel-Titan-Feilen // Endodontie. 2003. №12. Р. 229-241.
16. Беляева Т. С., Ржанов Е. А. Конструктивные особенности вращаемых (ротационных) эндодонтических инструментов // Эндодонтия. 2010. №4. С. 3-12.
17. Beljaeva T. S., Rzhanov E. A. Konstruktivnye osobennosti vrashchaemyh (rotacionnyh) endodonticheskih instrumentov // Endodontija. 2010. №4. S. 3-12.
Review
For citations:
, Design features of the rotary endodontic instruments system ProFile. Endodontics Today. 2012;10(4):9-17. (In Russ.)