Forensic medical examination and civil procedure
Abstract
Within the domain of forensic medical examinations for civil cases of the damage caused to health by providing medical services discussed issues of its destination. In recent years the Russian Federation has multiple growth complaints about quality of medical care, which is caused primarily by changes in the law in the direction of securing priority of rights and freedoms in the field of health. The subject of forensic examination for civil cases of the damage caused to health by providing medical services is to establish the extent to which professional medical care supports needs of the patient. Legal assessment of facts is the prerogative of the court and subject to forensic examination does not apply. For example, the establishment of guilt is a function of the court and not a function of the forensic examination. This also relates to the recognition proper or improper quality and safety, as well as the establishment of a lack of quality or safety of the object, etc. A forensic examination is intended to describe the actual circumstances with expert medical point of view, and to give them a legal qualification the only court can do.
About the Authors
Е. Баринов
ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова Минздравсоцразвития России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
П. Ромодановский
ГБОУ ВПО МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова Минздравсоцразвития России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Баринов Е. Х., Родин О. В., Тихомиров А. В. Правовая общность и различия медицинской деятельности и судебно-медицинской экспертизы. // Медицинская экспертиза и право. 2010. №3. С. 5-7.
2. Barinov E. H., Rodin O. V., Tihomirov A. V. Pravovaja obshchnost' i razlichija medicinskoj dejatel'nosti i sudebno-medicinskoj ekspertizy. // Medicinskaja ekspertiza i pravo. 2010. №3. S. 5-7.
3. Баринов Е. Х., Родин О. В., Тихомиров А. В. Предметная область судебномедицинской экспертизы по гражданским делам о причинении вреда здоровью при оказании медицинских услуг // Медицинская экспертиза и право. 2010. №3. С. 8-15.
4. Barinov E. H., Rodin O. V., Tihomirov A. V. Predmetnaja oblast' sudebno-medicinskoj ekspertizy po grazhdanskim delam o prichinenii vreda zdorov'ju pri okazanii medicinskih uslug // Medicinskaja ekspertiza i pravo. 2010. №3. S. 8-15.
5. Баринов Е. Х., Тихомиров А. В. Судебно-медицинская экспертиза при решении вопросов, связанных с «медицинскими» спорами // Медицинская экспертиза и право. 2010. №6. С. 5-7.
6. Barinov E. H., Tihomirov A. V. Sudebno-medicinskaja ekspertiza pri reshenii voprosov, svjazannyh s «medicinskimi» sporami // Medicinskaja ekspertiza i pravo. 2010. №6. S. 5-7.
7. Finkel M. A., Alexander R. A. Conducting the medical history // J Child Sex Abus. 2011. Sep. №20 (5). Р. 486-504.
8. Hinchliffe J. Forensic odontology. Part 5. Child abuse issues // Br Dent J. 2011. May. №14, 210 (9). Р. 423-428.
9. Zadik Y. Aviation dentistry: current concepts and practice // Br Dent J. 2009. Jan. №10, 206 (1). Р. 11-16.
10. Popova T. G. Expert criteria of prosthetic stomatological treatment quality control // Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2008. №87 (3). Р. 61-63.
11. Pollak S. Clinical forensic medicine and its main fields of activity from the foundation of the German Society of Legal Medicine until today // Forensic Sci Int. 2004. Sep. №10, 144 (2-3). Р. 269-283.
12. Ritz-Timme S., Cattaneo C., Collins M. J, Waite E. R., Schütz H. W., Kaatsch H. J., Borrman H. I. Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise // Int J Legal Med. 2000. №113 (3). Р. 129-136.
13. Herforth A. Obligation to document front tooth injuries in adolescents for forensic purposes // Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1980. Feb. №35 (2). Р. 235-237
Review
For citations:
, Forensic medical examination and civil procedure. Endodontics Today. 2012;10(3):63-66. (In Russ.)
Email this article 