Применение метода интраоперационной микроскопии в хирургическом лечении периапикальных корневых кист
Abstract
Clinical examination of 30 patients after surgical treatment of periapical cysts was carried out at the Department of the
Departmental Surgical Dentistry and Implantology in Clinical Diagnostic Center of Moscow University of Medicine and
Dentistry. Patients were divided into 3 groups, 10 persons in each group. Patients in group №1 were treated using traditional
surgical approach. Retrograde filling technique was used in group №2. The use of dental operating microscope and microsurgical
techniques were applied in group №3. Patients were monitored throughout a 1,5 year recall period. The criteria of treatment
effectiveness, was based on asymptomatic clinical appearence and evidence of radiograph bone healing. The outcome of
the study showed high effectiveness of surgical periapical cysts treatment using dental operating microscope.
Departmental Surgical Dentistry and Implantology in Clinical Diagnostic Center of Moscow University of Medicine and
Dentistry. Patients were divided into 3 groups, 10 persons in each group. Patients in group №1 were treated using traditional
surgical approach. Retrograde filling technique was used in group №2. The use of dental operating microscope and microsurgical
techniques were applied in group №3. Patients were monitored throughout a 1,5 year recall period. The criteria of treatment
effectiveness, was based on asymptomatic clinical appearence and evidence of radiograph bone healing. The outcome of
the study showed high effectiveness of surgical periapical cysts treatment using dental operating microscope.
About the Authors
И. Вьючнов
МГМСУ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
А. Панин
МГМСУ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
В. Чувилкин
МГМСУ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Иорданишвили А. К. Хирургическое лечение периодонтитов и кист челюстей. - СПб., 2000.
2. Сабо. Д. Хирургия полости рта и челюстно-лицевой области. - Киев: Книга плюс, 2005. - С. 57-66.
3. Kim S. Principles of endodontic microsurgery // Dent. Clin. North. Am. 1997. №41. P. 481-497.
4. Hsu Y. Y., Kim S. The resected root surface. The issue of canal isthmuses // Dent. Clin. North Am. 1997. №41. P. 529-540.
5. Carr G. B. Surgical endodontics /Cohen S., Burns R., eds. Pathways of the pulp. 6-th ed. - St.Louis: Mosby, 1994. - P.531.
6. Rubinstein R. A., Kim S. Longterm follow-up cases considered healed 1 year after microsurgery //J.Endod. 2002. №28. P. 378-383.
7. Molven O., Halse A., Grung B. Surgical management of endodontic failures. Indications and treatment results // Int. J. Dent. 1991. №41. P. 33-42.
8. Tsesis I., Rosen E., Shwartz-Arad D., Fuss Z. Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique // J.Endod. 2006. №32. P. 412-416.
9. Carr G. B., Microscope in endodontics // J.Calif.Dent. Assoc. 1992. №20. P. 55-61.
10. Rubinstein R. A., Kim S. Shortterm observation of the results of endodontic surgery with the use of a surgical operation microscope and Super-EBA as root-end filing material //J. Endod. 1999. №25. P.43-48.
11. Kim S., Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review // J.Endod. 2006. Vol. 32. №7. P. 601-623.
Review
For citations:
, , . Endodontics Today. 2011;9(1):28-32. (In Russ.)
