Nonsurgical correction of skeletal class 2 malocclusion with Carriere Motion appliance
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-2-94-96
Abstract
The article considers principle and method of treatment of patient with skeletal class 2 malocclusion. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of Carrier Distalizer. Overall, the Carriere Distalizer appears to be effective in early results in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
About the Authors
M. M. Shubitidze
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Graduate student ot the Department ot Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
Moscow
Russian Federation
Graduate student ot the Department ot Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
Moscow
T. F. Kosyreva
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
Moscow
References
1. Madurantakam P. Fixed or removable function appliances for Class II malocclusions. Evid Based Dent. 2016;17(2):52-53.
2. Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, Miller DM. Distal displacement of the maxilla and the upper first molar. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:630-640.
3. Firouz M, Zernik J, Nanda R. Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102: 197-205.
4. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:40-50.
5. Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2008;78: 1133-1140.
6. Papadopoulos MA. Overview of the intra-maxillary noncompliance appliances with absolute anchorage. In: Ortho- dontic Treatment for the Class II Non-compliant Patient: Current Principles and Techniques. Edinburgh, Scotland: Elsevier, Mosby; 2006:341-344.
7. Papadopoulos MA. Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dento- facial Orthop. 2008;134:604.e1-. e16.
8. Carriere LA. NewClass II distalizer. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38: 224231.
9. Sandifer CL, English JD, Colville CD, Gallerano RL, Akyalcin S. Treatment effects of the Carrie're distalizer using lingual arch and full fixed appliances. J World Fed Orthod. 2014;3: e49-e54.
10. Areepong D, Kim KB, Oliver DR, Ueno H. The Class II Carriere Motion appliance: A 3D CBCT evaluation of the effects on the dentition [published online ahead of print, 2020 Mar 5]. Angle Orthod. 2020:10.2319/080919-523.1. doi:10.2319/080919-523.1
11. Popowich K, Nebbe B, Heoc G, Glover K, Major P. Predictors for Class II treatment duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:293-300.
12. McFarlane B. Class II correction prior to orthodontics with the carriere distalizer. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 2013;24(3):35-36.
13. Kim-Berman H, McNamara JA Jr, Lints JP, McMullen C, Franchi L. Treatment effects of the Carriere® Motion 3D™ appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion in adolescents. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(6):839-846.
Review
For citations:
Shubitidze M.M., Kosyreva T.F. Nonsurgical correction of skeletal class 2 malocclusion with Carriere Motion appliance. Endodontics Today. 2020;18(2):94-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-2-94-96
Email this article 