Features of the structure of the alveolar process in patients with gnatic form of mesial occlusion
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-3-15-25
Abstract
Aim. To assess the size of the alveolar ridge / part of the jaws in patients with gnathic mesial occlusion of the dentition.
Materials and methods. A study was carried out, during which we determined the structural features of the alveolar ridge of the upper and lower jaws of 50 adult patients (from 18 to 44 years old), and also studied the presence / absence of the relationship of this parameter with the inclination of the teeth.
Results. The smallest thickness of the alveolar bone in the upper jaw was observed in the area of the mesio-buccal root of the first molars and in the area of the first premolars and canines. The smallest thickness of the alveolar bone in the lower jaw was observed in the area of the vestibular surface of the first and second premolars, canines and incisors. The greatest thickness of the alveolar bone is observed in the distal-buccal region of the second molars.
Conclusions. A natural mechanism promotes dentoalveolar compensation, while maintaining the amount of bone in the region of the vestibular and lingual alveolar bones to maintain the integrity of the periodontium.
About the Authors
A. B. Mallaeva
“Moscow State Medical University of Dentistry named after A.I. Evdokimov”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Graduate student
Moscow
N. S. Drobysheva
“Moscow State Medical University of Dentistry named after A.I. Evdokimov”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor
Moscow
References
1. Persin LS, Orthodontics. Diagnostics and treatment of dento-maxillofacial anomalies and deformities. GEOTAR-Media. 2016: 640.
2. Drobyshev A.Yu., Anastasov G. Fundamentals of orthognathic surgery. Printed city. 2007
3. Glushko AV, Assessment of morphometric changes in the upper respiratory tract in patients during orthognathic operations. 2013: 136 s
4. Sviridov EG, Features of diagnosis and treatment of patients with asymmetric deformities of the jaws caused by hypo- and hyperplasia of the condylar process of the lower jaw. 2015: 213.
5. Dibirov TM, Features of diagnosis and planning of surgical treatment of adult patients with asymmetric jaw deformities. 2013: 170.
6. Kurakin KA, Aesthetic aspects of planning and surgical stage of combined treatment of patients with gnathic form of distal occlusion. 2013: 231.
7. Arnett G.W., McLaughlin R.P. Facial and dental planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. - London: Mosby, 2004.
8. Baccetti T, Reyes BC, McNamara JA Jr. Gender differences in Class III. Angle Orhod 2005; 75: 510-20.
9. Ngan P, Moon W: Evolution of Class III treatment in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 22-36.
10. Chen, F., Terada, K., and Hanada, K. A special method of predicting mandibular growth potential for Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 191-195.
11.
Review
For citations:
Mallaeva A.B., Drobysheva N.S. Features of the structure of the alveolar process in patients with gnatic form of mesial occlusion. Endodontics Today. 2020;18(3):15-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-3-15-25
Email this article 