Use of a volumetric-stable collagen matrix to correct soft tissue volume
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-4-65-68
Abstract
Aim. To study keratinized gingiva using a volume-stable collagen matrix in the first 6 months after soft tissue augmentation.
Materials and methods. The clinical study included 59 patients (27 men and 32 women, aged 27 to 50). The surgical protocol includes the following steps: supracrestal incision with a full-thickness flap elevation. Setting the stable collagen matrix (Fibro-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma, Wolhusen, Switzerland). The flap was closed with 5-0 non-absorbable nylon continuous sutures.
Results. The average operation time was 75.1 ± 13.2 minutes. The width of the keratinized gingiva before the operation was 0.7 ± 0.32 mm and after 180 days its dimensions were 9.3 ± 3.1 mm.
Conclusions. The results of this study showed that 3D collagen matrix is an effective agent for soft tissue augmentation in the implant area.
About the Authors
A. B. Adzhieva
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student.
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Z. S. Khabadze
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Therapeutic Dentistry.
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Ya. A. Yollybayev
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Resident student.
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Sh. J. Hossain
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Resident student.
Moscow.
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
1.
2. Zucchelli, G.; Mounssif, I. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontology 2000. 2015; 68: 333–368
3. 2. Bassetti, M.; Kaufmann, R.; Salvi, G.E.; Sculean, A.; Bassetti, R. Soft tissue grafting to improve the attached mucosa at dental implants: A review of the literature and proposal of a decision tree. Quintessence Int. 2015; 46: 499–510
4. Griffin, T.J.; Cheung, W.S.; Zavras, A.I.; Damoulis, P.D. Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J. Periodontol. 2006; 77: 2070–2079
5. Reiser, G.M.; Bruno, J.F.; Mahan, P.E.; Larkin, L.H. The subepithelial connective tissue graft palatal donor site: Anatomic considerations for surgeons. Int. J. Periodont. Restor. Dent. 1996; 16: 130 –137.
6. Sanz, M.; Lorenzo, R.; Aranda, J.J.; Martin, C.; Orsini, M. Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: A randomized prospective clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2009; 36: 868–876.
7. Yukna, R.A.; Tow, H.D.; Caroll, P.B.; Vernino, A.R.; Bright, R.W. Comparative clinical evaluation of freeze-dried skin allografts and autogenous gingival grafts in humans. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1977; 4: 191–199.
8. Wainwright, D.J. Use of an acellular allograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) in the management of full-thickness burns. Burns. 1995; 21: 243–248.
9. Langer, R.; Vacanti, J.P. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260: 920–926.
10. Schmitt CM, Tudor C, Kiener K, Wehrhan F, Schmitt J, Eitner S, Agaimy A, Schlegel KA. Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: a clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol. 2013 Jul;84(7):914-23.
11. Thoma, D.S.; Zeltner, M.; Hilbe, M.; Hammerle, C.H.; Husler, J.; Jung, R.E. Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2016; 43: 874–885.
12. Thoma, D.S.; Nanni, N.; Benic, G.I.; Weber, F.E.; Hammerle, C.H.; Jung, R.E. Effect of platelet-derived growth factor-BB on tissue integration of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen matrices in a rat ectopic model. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2015. 26: 263–270.
13. Thoma, D.S.; Villar, C.C.; Cochran, D.L.; Hammerle, C.H.; Jung, R.E. Tissue integration of collagen-based matrices: An experimental study in mice. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2012. 23: 1333–1339.
14. Ferrantino, L.; Bosshardt, D.; Nevins, M.; Santoro, G.; Simion, M.; Kim, D. Tissue Integration of a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix in an Experimental Soft Tissue Augmentation Model. Int. J. Periodont. Restor. Dent. 2016; 36: 807–815
15. Zeltner, M.; Jung, R.E.; Hammerle, C.H.; Husler, J.; Thoma, D.S. Randomized controlled clinical study comparing a volume- stable collagen matrix to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: Linear volumetric soft tissue changes up to 3 months. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017; 44: 446– 453.
16. Thoma, D.S.; Naenni, N.; Benic, G.I.; Hammerle, C.H.; Jung, R.E. Soft tissue volume augmentation at dental implant sites using a volume stable three-dimensional collagen matrix–Histological outcomes of a preclinical study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017; 44: 185– 194.
17. Aamodt, J.M.; Grainger, D.W. Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response. Biomaterials 2016; 86: 68–82.
18.
Review
For citations:
Adzhieva A.B., Khabadze Z.S., Yollybayev Ya.A., Hossain Sh.J. Use of a volumetric-stable collagen matrix to correct soft tissue volume. Endodontics Today. 2020;18(4):65-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-4-65-68
Email this article 