Features and challenges in the diagnosis of patients with maxillary hypodontia
https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0074
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. In the management of patients with agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors, a number of important issues arise related to the amount of free space, the age of the patient, types of occlusions and the condition of adjacent teeth. There are three treatment options for patients diagnosed with agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors. These options include canine mesialization, restoration based on adjacent teeth, and implantation. There are also special criteria that need to be considered when choosing an appropriate treatment option.
When planning all types of treatment, first, attention should be paid to the preservation of teeth. As a rule, the chosen treatment method should be the least invasive and meet the expected aesthetic and functional goals. The orthodontist plays a key role in achieving specific space requirements by placing the teeth in the ideal position for restoration. For example, canine mesialization may be one of the acceptable aesthetic treatments for patients with agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors. However, if it is used in the wrong patient, the result may be far from ideal. Ultimately, an interdisciplinary approach is the most predictable way to achieve optimal end aesthetics.
AIM. To study the literature to compile a review on the diagnosis and evaluation criteria of patients with agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. Analysis of foreign literature data, scientific publications, electronic resources.
RESULTS. The treatment plan for patients with the absence of lateral incisors of the upper jaw should be drawn up taking into account the dental, functional and aesthetic aspects identified during the initial clinical examination.
CONCLUSIONS. The absence of lateral incisors in the upper jaw, with any accompanying malocclusion, should be treated as part of the overall treatment plan. Factors such as the individual characteristics of the patient, the size, shape, position, and color of teeth, their effect on the bite, as well as overall facial aesthetics, should all be taken into consideration when deciding whether to create an implant space or close one.
About the Authors
R. A. Mokhamed El-Khalaf
Russian University of Medicine
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Ramiz A. Mokhamed El-Khalaf – Postgraduate Student
4, Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow 127006
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
N. S. Drobysheva
Russian University of Medicine
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Nailya S. Drobysheva – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor in the Department of Orthodontics RUM
4, Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow 127006
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
1. Bavlakova V.V., Fayzulina R.A., Mamkhiagova M.M. Early orthodontic treatment of patients with partial primary adentia. Glavnyi Vrach Uga Russia. 2019;(3):21–22. (In Russ.)
2. Dzhangildin Yu.T., Murachuyeva A.G., Slabkovskaya A.B., Gadzhiyeva U.Kh. Clinical and psychological characteristics of adolescents who are in need of orthodontic treatment. Bulletin of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery. 2019;(12):8–13. (In Russ.)
3. Postnikov M.A. Orthodontic treatment of patients with sagittal occlusion anomalies and partial anodontia. Moscow: Ofort; 2015. 120 p. (In Russ.)
4. Naoum S., Allan Z., Yeap C.K., Razza J.M., Murray K., Turlach B., Goonewardene M.S. Trends in orthodontic management strategies for patients with congenitally missing lateral incisors and premolars. Angle Orthod. 2021;91(4):477–483. https://doi.org/10.2319/092320-809.1
5. Abu-Hussein M., Watted N., Abdulgani A., Borbély P. Modern treatment for congenitally missing teeth: A multidisciplinary approach. International Journal of Maxillofacial Research. 2015;1(2):179–190.
6. Josefsson E., Lindsten R. Treatment of missing maxillary lateral incisors: a clinical and aesthetic evaluation. Eur J Orthod. 2019;41(3):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjy061
7. Seehra J., Al-Ali A., Pandis N., Cobourne M.T. Space closure versus space opening for bilateral absent upper lateral incisors: what is the duration of orthodontic treatment? Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(4):460–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz062
8. Drobysheva N.S., Lezhnev D.A., Petrovskaya V.V., Batova M.A., Perova N.G., Mallaeva A.B. et al. Cone beam computed tomography use in orthodontics. Orthodontia. 2019;(1):32–39. (In Russ.)
9. Cheng H.C., Wang Y.C. Effect of nonextraction and extraction orthodontic treatments on smile esthetics for different malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(1):81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.033
10. Mendes L.M., Janson G., Zingaretti Junqueira-Mendes C.H., Garib D.G. Long-term profile attractiveness in Class II Division 1 malocclusion patients treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(3):362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.04.030
11. Rosa M. Missing teeth in the smile area: space closure in all malocclusions looking for long term health, esthetics and function. Semin Orthod. 2020;26(1):52–60. https:// doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2020.01.006
12. Jamilian A., Darnahal A., Nucci L., D’Apuzzo F., Perillo L. Treatment considerations for missing teeth. In: Kivanç B.H. Dental Anatomy. InTech; 2018, pp. 109–120. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69543
13. Park J.H., Oh J.Y., Lee S.Y., Kook Y.A., Han S.H. Correction of an adult Class III malocclusion through regaining of orthodontic space and an implant restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(1):297–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12870
14. Zhmyrko I.N., Drobysheva N.S. Description of the expression index index for patients with gnatic from of mesial occlusion. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2020;24(1):11–18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18821/1728-2802-2020-24-1-11-18
15. Zhmyrko I.N. Justification for the use of combined treatment in patients with dental arch occlusion anomalies caused by jaw development disorders: Dissertation. Moscow; 2021. 149 p.
16. Jakymec’A., Drogomyrec’ka M. Clinical examination protocol and procedure of selecting treatment of patients with upper lateral incisors adentia. Modern Science. 2015;2(3):164–172.
17. Rosa M., Lucchi P., Ferrari S., Zachrisson B.U., Caprioglio A. Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors: Long-term periodontal and functional evaluation after orthodontic space closure with first premolar intrusion and canine extrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149(3):339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.08.016
18. Rosa M., Zachrisson B.U. Chapter 25 – Missing maxillary lateral incisors: New procedures and indications for optimal space closure. In: Nanda R. Esthetics and Biomechanics in Orthodontics. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2014, pp. 528–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-5085-6.00025-4
19. Silveira G.S., Mucha J.N. Agenesis of maxillary lateral incisors: Treatment involves much more than just canine guidance. Open Dent J. 2016;10:19–27. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010019
20. Sobral M.C. Solutions for atypical problems in the incisors area: a transdisciplinary challenge. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020;25(2):86–102. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.25.2.086-102.sar
21. Calheiros-Lobo M.J., Calheiros-Lobo M., Pinho T. Esthetic perception of different clinical situations of maxillary lateral incisor agenesis according to populations with dental and non-dental backgrounds: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent J. 2023;11(4):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj11040105
22. Lopes-Rocha L., Garcez J., Tiritan M.E., da Silva L.F.M., Pinho T. Maxillary lateral incisor agenesis and microdontia: Minimally invasive symmetric and asymmetric esthetic rehabilitation. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac. 2022;63(1):41–51. https://doi.org/10.24873/j.rpemd.2022.01.857
23. Rees D.J. A method for assessing the proportional relation of apical bases and contact diameters of the teeth. Am J Orthod. 1953;39(9):695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(53)90122-5
24. Krassnig M., Fickl S. Congenitally missing lateral incisors – a comparison between restorative, implant, and orthodontic approaches. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(2):283–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.004
25. Mallaeva A.B., Drobysheva N.S. Features of the structure of the alveolar process in patients with gnatic form of mesial occlusion. Endodontics Today. 2020;18(3):15–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-3-15-25
26. Mallaeva A.B., Drobisheva N.S., Petrovskaya V.V., Slabkovskaya A.B., Drobishev A.Yu. Features of the structure and size of the jaws in patients with mesial occlusion. Orthodontia. 2020;(4):11–23. (In Russ.) Available at: https://orthodont.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/86 (accessed: 13.09.2024).
Review
For citations:
Mokhamed El-Khalaf R.A., Drobysheva N.S. Features and challenges in the diagnosis of patients with maxillary hypodontia. Endodontics Today. 2025;23(1):95-100. https://doi.org/10.36377/ET-0074
Email this article 