Reliability assessment of the aesthetic restoration quality: objective or subjective approach?
https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.2.2018.4.9
Abstract
It is very difficult to perform a qualitative aesthetic tooth restoration, and it is even more difficult to give an objective assessment of the restoration. The previously developed clear scheme and criteria for evaluation simplified the procedure for determining the quality of the restoration made by doctors. However, the objectivity of such assessment is still in question due to the biased attitude to own work. Involvement of independent specialists into the evaluation procedure, as well as patients and their relatives, will increase the degree of analysis objectivity and increase the number of errors detected at the initial stage, when there is a possibility to correct them. Consequently, the more demanding and objective the assessment of the completed tooth restoration is, the higher will be its quality.
About the Authors
A. V. Mitronin
Кафедра кариесологии и эндодонтии ФГБОУ ВО МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова Минздрава РФ.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. Yu. Grishin
Кафедра терапевтической стоматологии ФГБОУ ВО Кировский ГМУ Минздрава РФ.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. A. Ostanina
Кафедра кариесологии и эндодонтии ФГБОУ ВО МГМСУ им. А.И. Евдокимова Минздрава РФ.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Nikolaev A. I., Gil'mijarov E. M., Mitronin A. V., Sadovskij V. V. Kriterii ocenki kompozitnyh restavracij zubov. Monografija. – M.: MEDpresinform, 2015. – 96 s.
2. Mitronin A. V., Grishin S. Ju. Kriterii ocenki kachestva jesteticheskoj restavracii zuba // Cathedra-Kafedra. Stomatologicheskoe obrazovanie. 2011. №37. S. 52-54.
3. Mitronin A. V., Grishin S. Ju. Kriterii ocenki kachestva jesteticheskoj restavracii zuba // Cathedra-Kafedra. Stomatologicheskoe brazovanie.
4. №37. S. 55-57.
5. Mitronin A. V., Pojurovskaja I., Primerova A.S., Chunihin A. A. Sravnenie in vitro polimerizacionnoj usadki restavracionnyh kompozitnyh materialov na osnove silorana i metakrilatov // Endodontija today. 2011. №2. S. 17-19
6. Mitronin A. V., Chunihin A. A., Abaev Z. M., Basova A. A., Grishin S. Ju., Primerova A. S., Savina N. P. Primenenie kompozitnogo materiala na siloranovoj osnove v vosstanovitel''noj terapii zubov zhevatel''noj gruppy // Cathedra-Kafedra. Stomatologicheskoe obrazovanie. 2014. №49. S. 32-36.
7. Mitronin A. V., Pojurovskaja I., Primerova A. S. i dr. Sravnenie in vitro
8. polimerizatsionnoj usadki restavratsionnyh kompozitnyh materialov na
9. osnove silorana i metakrilatov //`Endodontija today. 2011. №2. S. 17-19.
10. Mitronin A. V. Kariesologija i zabolevanija tvjordyh tkanej. Endodontija. Testovye zadanija i situacionnye zadachi // pod red. prof. A.V. Mitronina. Uchebnoe Posobie. – M.: MGMSU, 2015. – 83 s.
11. Mitronin A. V., Grishin S. Ju. Kriterii sovremennoj jekspertnoj ocenki kachestva esteticheskih rabot v stomatologii.Monografija «Rekonstruktivnye tehnologii v stomatologii i cheljustno-licevoj hirurgii» / pod red. d.m.n., prof. O.O. Janushevicha. – M. – Lipeck – Voronezh, 2014. – S. 137-144.
12. Primerova A. S., Mitronin A. V., CHunihin A. A. Klinicheskaya ocenka effektivnosti primeneniya sovremennyh kompozicionnyh materialov v vosstanovitel'noj terapii zhevatel'noj gruppy zubov // Endodontiya today. 2011. №4. S. 20-26.
13. Ryge G. Clinical criteria // Int. Dent. J. 1980. Vol 30. №4. P. 347-358.
Review
For citations:
Mitronin A.V., Grishin S.Yu., Ostanina D.A. Reliability assessment of the aesthetic restoration quality: objective or subjective approach? Endodontics Today. 2018;16(4):40-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25636/PMP.2.2018.4.9
Email this article 