Method of evaluation of the extent of skeletal forms of malocclusion
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-2-22-28
Abstract
An integrated approach to diagnostics for choosing a treatment strategy helps to obtain stable, functionally complete results and minimizes the relapse possibility. In skeletal forms of distal malocclusion, it is necessary to take into account the severity of maxillofacial changes to choose a treatment algorithm.
For this aim, to assess the severity of dentofacial anomalies an index has been developed.
Materiais and methods. To develop the index 60 patients with varying degrees of distal occlusion were examined comprehensively. Dental casts, photometry and a lateral cephalography were analyzed.
Resuits. Aftera statistical analysis of the data, an index that reliably proves the severity of maxillofacial anomalies was created, which is rationale for choosing a method of treating patients with skeletal form of distal occlusion: orthognathic or compensatory orthodontic treatment.
Conciusions. The proposed technique is a convenient express method for the diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with dento-maxillofacialanomalies.
About the Authors
I. N. Zhmyrko
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of the Higher Education "A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior Assistant
Moscow
N. S. Drobysheva
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of the Higher Education "A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Associate Professor
Moscow
References
1. Persin L.S. Orthodontics. Diagnostics and treatment of dentomaxillo- facial anomalies and deformities. GEOTAR-Media. 2016. 640 p.
2. Myagkova N.V., Styazhkin N.V. Current treatment options for adult patients with maxillary forms of malocclusion. Actual problems in dentistry. 2011. №. 5.
3. DrobyshevA.Y., Drobysheva N. S., Frolova V.I., FofanovaY.S., Chantyr I. V. Psychometric evaluation ofthe levelsof anxietyand depression in adult patients with dentomaxillo-facial abnormalities before and after surgery. The Russian archives of internal medicine. №S1.2016. P. 73-73.
4. Vaida L. et al. Correlations between stress, anxiety and coping mechanisms in orthodontic patients. Iranian journal of public health. 2015. T. 44. №. 1. P. 147-149.
5. Zhou X. et al. Prevalence of Malocclusion in 3-to 5-year-old children in Shanghai, China International journal of environmental research and public health. 2017. T. 14. №. 3. P. 328.
6. Heymann G.C., Cevidanes L., Cornells M., De Clerk H.J., Camilla Tulloch J.F. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010.- 137(2). P. 274-84
7. Drobyshev A.Y., Anastasov G. Orthognathic surgery basics. - Pechatniy gorod. 2007. 55 p.
8. Kovalenko A.V. Assessment of perception of facial aesthetics in patients with gnathic forms of malocclusions before and after com bined treatment. - Dissertation for the candidate of medical science degree. Moscow. 2011. 25 p.
9. Myagkova N.V., Beldyagina M.M. The choice of treatment based on a quantitative assessment of the severity of mesial occlusion. Actual problems in dentistry. 2013. №. 4.
10. Arnett G. W., McLaughlin R. P. Facial and dental planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. London: Mosby. 2004.
Review
For citations:
Zhmyrko I.N., Drobysheva N.S. Method of evaluation of the extent of skeletal forms of malocclusion. Endodontics Today. 2020;18(2):22-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-2-22-28
Email this article 