Preview

Endodontics Today

Advanced search

The use of the Carriere Motion 3D in orthodontist practice. A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-2-62-67

Abstract

Aim. To determine the effectiveness of the Carriere Motion 3D orthodontic device in the treatment of malocclusions II and III classes. The action of the device is based on distalization of the lateral segment of the dentition from the canine to the tirst molar as a whole with the preservation of isolated micro-movement of the key teeth.

Materials and methods. During a systematic review of the literature, the analysis of publications in the electronic databases Google Scholar and PubMed was carried out. Included publications the main part of which included a description of working methods with Carriere Motion 3D, dinicai cases using the presented distalizer, and consideration of the target and undesirable effects of the device.

Results. 43 articles were viewed during the review. After analyzing the literature for inclusion criteria, the total numberofpublications has become 33.

Conclusions. Carriere Motion 3D is quite effective for correcting incorrect molar relationships in the presence of malocclusion of the second and third class, but it cannot be called the only correct way to resolve malocclusions.

About the Authors

M. M. Shubitidze
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Graduate student ot the Department ot Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
Moscow


T. F. Kosyreva
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Dentistryand Orthodontics

Moscow



Yu. A. Generalova
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Student of Medical Institute

Moscow



M. G. Sheroziia
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Student of Medical Institute

Moscow



A. A. Nedashkovsky
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Student of Medical Institute

Moscow



V. S. Shubaeva
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Student of Medical Institute

Moscow



A. V. Zoryan
"Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (RUDN University)
Russian Federation

Ph.D, Associate Professor of the Department of Therapeutic Dentistry

Moscow



References

1. GrippaudoC, Paolantonio EG, Antonini G, Saulle R, La Torre G, Deli R. Association between oral habits, mouth breathing and malocclusion. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016 Oct;36(5):386-394.

2. Fleming, P. S., DiBiase, A. T., & Cobourne, M. T. The aetiology of malocclusion: a contemporary view. Orthodontic Update (2008). 1(1), 16-21.

3. John R.C. Mew. The postural basis of malocclusion: A philosophical overview. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Volume 126, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 729-738.

4. Zawawi KH, Al-Harthi SM, Al-Zahrani MS. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to dental malocclusion. Saudi Med J. 2012;33(6):671-675.

5. Hassan, Rahimah, and A. K. Rahimah. Occlusion, malocclusion and method of measurements-an overview. Archives of orofacial sciences 2 (2007): 3-9.

6. Вае J, Son WS, Kim SS, ParkSB, Kim'/I. Com parison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion. Korean J Orthod. 2017 May;47(3):151-157.

7. Samir E. Bishara. Class II Malocclusions: Diagnostic and Clinical Considerations With and Without Treatment. Seminars in Orthodontics, Volume 12, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 11-24.

8. Bolya, P., Rajput, B. S., Tiwari, G., Yadav, H. S., Choubey, A., & Swarnkar, S. K. (2015). Intraoral approach to molar distalization: A review. IJOCR, 2(1), 75-80.

9. Yin, K.,Han,E.,Guo,J.etal. Evaluating the treatment effectiveness and efficiency of Carriere Distalizer: a cephalometric and study model comparison of Class II appliances. Prog Orthod. 20, 24 (2019).

10. Jacques, L.. Upper Arch Molar Distalization Appliances in Treatment of Class II Malocclusion: ACritical Analysis. IJO (2016), 27(3), 1-8.

11. Carriere Motion Class II & III Quick Start Guide.

12. Carriere L. A new Class II distalizer. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics: JCO. 2004 Apr;38(4):224-231.

13. Ahmed, A., Ibrahim, S., Mohamed, M. Evaluation of Electromyographic Activity Concomitant to Class II Correction Using Carrier Distalizer Appliance. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls, 2020; 7, Issue 2 April- Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics issue. Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics: 295-303.

14. Quinzi, V.; Marchetti, E.; Guerriero, L.; Bosco, F.; Marzo, G.; Mummolo, S. Dentoskeletal Class II Malocclusion: Maxillary Molar Distalization with No-Compliance Fixed Orthodontic Equipment. Dent. J. 2020, 8, 26.

15. Behta Pardo Lopez, D. D. S., Cobo, J. Distalizer Treatment of an Adult Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion.

16. Daniel Areepong, Ki Beom Kim, Donald R. Oliver, Hiroshi Ueno; The Class II Carriere Motion appliance:A 3D CBCT evaluation of the effects on the dentition. Angle Orthod 1 July 2020; 90 (4): 491-499.

17. Camille L. Sandifer, Jeryl D. English, Clark D. Colville, Ron L. Gallerano, Sercan Akyalcin. Treatment effects of the Carriere distalizer using lingual arch and full fixed appliances. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists, Volume 3, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 49-54.

18. Hera Kim-Berman, James A. McNamara, Joel P. Lints, Craig McMullen, Lorenzo Franchi; Treatment effects of the Carriere® Motion 3D™ appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion in adolescents. Angle Orthod 1 November 2019; 89 (6): 839-846.

19. Popowich K, Nebbe B, Heoc G, Glover K, Major P. Predictors for Class II treatment duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:293-300.

20. Schupp, Werner, Julia Haubrich, and Iris Neumann. Class II correction with the Invisalign system. J Clin Orthod 44.1 (2010): 28-35.

21. Hamilton CF, Saltaji H, Preston CB, Flores-Mir C, Tabbaa S. Adolescent patients' experience with the Carriere distalizer appliance. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(3):219-224.

22. Hashem, Ahmed Sh. Three dimensional assessment of the longterm treatment stability after maxillary first molar distalization with Carriere distalizer appliance. Life Science Journal 17.2 (2020).

23. Su Mu. Clinical application of Carriere Distalizer appliance in treating angle Class □ and skeletal class □ malocclusion. Journal of Aerospace Medicine. 2011-04.

24. Rodriguez, H. L. (2019). Long-Term Stability ofTwo-Phase Class II Treatment with the Carriere Motion Appliance. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO, 53(8), 481-487.

25. Nasef, A., & Refai, W. M. Application of a NewThree Dimensional Method of Analysis for Com parison between the Effects of Two Different Methods of Distalization of the Maxillary First Molar.

26. Rodriguez H. L. Nonextraction treatment of a class II open bite in an adult patient. 2012.

27. Carriere, L.. Nonsurgical Correction of Severe Skeletal Class III Malocclusion. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics: JCO 50.4 (2016): 216230.

28. Wilson, B. M. (2018). The Class II Carriere Motion Appliance: A 3D Comparison of the Shorty and Standard Carriere Appliances Using CBCT (Doctoral dissertation. Saint Louis University).

29. Sorensen, J. V. (2019). A Comparative Study of the Carriere Motion Appliance and Class II Elastics: CBCT Analysis of Treatment Effects (Doctoral dissertation. Saint Louis University).

30. Attia, K. H., M. H. Aboulfotouh, and A. S. Fouda. Threedimensional computed tomography evaluation of airway changes after treatment with Carriere Motion 3D Class II appliance. J Dent Maxillofacial Res 2.1 (2019): 16-19.

31. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, P.. Group Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern.. Med, 151 (2009), pp. 264-269.

32. Higgins J.P.T., Altman D.G. In: Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies. Higgins J.P.T., Green S., editors. Wiley Blackwellm; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2008. [Google Scholar]

33. Higgins J.P.T., Altman D.G., Gotzsche P.C., Juni P., Moher D., Oxman A.D., Savovic J., Schulz K.F., Weeks L., Sterne J.A. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.


Review

For citations:


Shubitidze M.M., Kosyreva T.F., Generalova Yu.A., Sheroziia M.G., Nedashkovsky A.A., Shubaeva V.S., Zoryan A.V. The use of the Carriere Motion 3D in orthodontist practice. A systematic review. Endodontics Today. 2020;18(2):62-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-2-62-67



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1683-2981 (Print)
ISSN 1726-7242 (Online)